Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: use SACK RTTs for CC

[Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>]

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Kenneth Klette Jonassen
> <kennetkl@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>> Current behavior only passes RTTs from sequentially acked data to CC.
>>
>> If sender gets a combined ACK for segment 1 and SACK for segment 3, then the
>> computed RTT for CC is the time between sending segment 1 and receiving SACK
>> for segment 3.
> since segment 3 is sent after segment 1, sack_rtt_us <= ca_seq_rtt so
> taking a min is not necessary?
ah i didn't notice you are taking a min_t of ulong for invalid
sack_rtt_us now i get it.


>
>>
>> Pass the minimum computed RTT from any acked data to CC, i.e. time between
>> sending segment 3 and receiving SACK for segment 3.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Klette Jonassen <kennetkl@ifi.uio.no>
>> ---
>>  net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 6 ++++--
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>> index 71fb37c..ed11931 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>> @@ -3183,8 +3183,10 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct sock *sk, int prior_fackets,
>>
>>                 tp->fackets_out -= min(pkts_acked, tp->fackets_out);
>>
>> -               if (ca_ops->pkts_acked)
>> -                       ca_ops->pkts_acked(sk, pkts_acked, ca_seq_rtt_us);
>> +               if (ca_ops->pkts_acked) {
>> +                       long rtt_us = min_t(ulong, ca_seq_rtt_us, sack_rtt_us);
>> +                       ca_ops->pkts_acked(sk, pkts_acked, rtt_us);
>> +               }
>>
>>         } else if (skb && rtt_update && sack_rtt_us >= 0 &&
>>                    sack_rtt_us > skb_mstamp_us_delta(&now, &skb->skb_mstamp)) {
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html