From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE58C43441 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 02:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68F2206B2 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 02:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="MYhJUu0L" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D68F2206B2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2439542AbeKWNVZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:21:25 -0500 Received: from conssluserg-04.nifty.com ([210.131.2.83]:62207 "EHLO conssluserg-04.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727343AbeKWNVZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:21:25 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 335 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:21:22 EST Received: from mail-vs1-f42.google.com (mail-vs1-f42.google.com [209.85.217.42]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-04.nifty.com with ESMTP id wAN2cus7032084; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:38:56 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-04.nifty.com wAN2cus7032084 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1542940737; bh=RwCL9Ri+CN8GV/mcouXy7Bn2m5DMHOHs2NKrn7tRBFs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=MYhJUu0L0a+CSKTHu66tCSIlEPx+cikVX1ZeeFJJJm+V/LS62+QKlo0YuU3BlAbbw AsWTdHqbqdveA+kVvHdFVvyOuwFaH8+owiGVG4pVsSpFbI97zO2nPbIrDm9G8w+JJA HQJBZ6OaYZqSTOmFr3ri2G48XmixRLG+GICPONonqugmiLwoeF6GXdpFb+zWI52b3n +Y/q6MvJjeUsBEWsY/sIEaEPQ+fX+mycQqY7B6OtENsc5C3eCOVeov8yPQZYqRumiY G/yEfSi/YD5kR1o+R1Vy4v9aP/E9epQ21KXaYMb/2lBHJJByu1kQlaB3xOQU5okA1+ XTsn9lvMF8w/g== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.217.42] Received: by mail-vs1-f42.google.com with SMTP id h78so6377163vsi.6; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 18:38:56 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIUoHc7NwZzKr1LkWAtjqVALNLznVgPUJMKO8XTrjbpSZhPN6wO 5fKXW8D+O+GNeHmH5clXWNZ9/ohYanfWGMoRK6Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5f4wWYkg8NhA/njL96dQLq3mhUgERT/Zv/ehLhsyoNXgp6lt+kzLsJHDfpawOK7kvxkQQ7+Im2odf8doeLp64Y= X-Received: by 2002:a67:a858:: with SMTP id r85mr5688337vse.215.1542940735781; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 18:38:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181115190538.17016-1-hch@lst.de> <20181115190538.17016-2-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20181115190538.17016-2-hch@lst.de> From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:38:20 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] arm: remove EISA kconfig option To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: mporter@kernel.crashing.org, Alex Bounine , Dominik Brodowski , Linux Kbuild mailing list , linux-arm-kernel , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linuxppc-dev , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Linux-MIPS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:06 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > No arm config enables EISA, and arm does not include drivers/eisa/Kconfig > which provides support for things like PCI to EISA bridges, so it is most > likely dead. As I said before, this is absolutely dead. Only the difference between arch/powerpc/Kconfig and arch/arm/Kconfig is the presence of ---help--- property. I squashed this to "eisa: consolidate EISA ..." > Suggested-by: Masahiro Yamada > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > arch/arm/Kconfig | 15 --------------- > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > index 91be74d8df65..f24a7435d19a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > @@ -163,21 +163,6 @@ config HAVE_PROC_CPU > config NO_IOPORT_MAP > bool > > -config EISA > - bool > - ---help--- > - The Extended Industry Standard Architecture (EISA) bus was > - developed as an open alternative to the IBM MicroChannel bus. > - > - The EISA bus provided some of the features of the IBM MicroChannel > - bus while maintaining backward compatibility with cards made for > - the older ISA bus. The EISA bus saw limited use between 1988 and > - 1995 when it was made obsolete by the PCI bus. > - > - Say Y here if you are building a kernel for an EISA-based machine. > - > - Otherwise, say N. > - > config SBUS > bool > > -- > 2.19.1 > -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F41C43441 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 03:58:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DF6520664 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 03:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="MYhJUu0L" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6DF6520664 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431Mx94RR0zDqSx for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:58:37 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="MYhJUu0L"; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.82; helo=conssluserg-03.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="MYhJUu0L"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conssluserg-03.nifty.com (conssluserg-03.nifty.com [210.131.2.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 431L9j2qkWzDqSJ for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 13:39:20 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from mail-vs1-f47.google.com (mail-vs1-f47.google.com [209.85.217.47]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-03.nifty.com with ESMTP id wAN2cu2E027092 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:38:56 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-03.nifty.com wAN2cu2E027092 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1542940737; bh=RwCL9Ri+CN8GV/mcouXy7Bn2m5DMHOHs2NKrn7tRBFs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=MYhJUu0L0a+CSKTHu66tCSIlEPx+cikVX1ZeeFJJJm+V/LS62+QKlo0YuU3BlAbbw AsWTdHqbqdveA+kVvHdFVvyOuwFaH8+owiGVG4pVsSpFbI97zO2nPbIrDm9G8w+JJA HQJBZ6OaYZqSTOmFr3ri2G48XmixRLG+GICPONonqugmiLwoeF6GXdpFb+zWI52b3n +Y/q6MvJjeUsBEWsY/sIEaEPQ+fX+mycQqY7B6OtENsc5C3eCOVeov8yPQZYqRumiY G/yEfSi/YD5kR1o+R1Vy4v9aP/E9epQ21KXaYMb/2lBHJJByu1kQlaB3xOQU5okA1+ XTsn9lvMF8w/g== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.217.47] Received: by mail-vs1-f47.google.com with SMTP id x1so6359966vsc.10 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 18:38:56 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIz0UfUorAUDpAO3gKLBAAmWuiRnv/WuQNvf3j+U54QAbximdmR NGr3Lu0LGNBLY03li+TNUAp7DdBP47w5Z9XXByo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5f4wWYkg8NhA/njL96dQLq3mhUgERT/Zv/ehLhsyoNXgp6lt+kzLsJHDfpawOK7kvxkQQ7+Im2odf8doeLp64Y= X-Received: by 2002:a67:a858:: with SMTP id r85mr5688337vse.215.1542940735781; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 18:38:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181115190538.17016-1-hch@lst.de> <20181115190538.17016-2-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20181115190538.17016-2-hch@lst.de> From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:38:20 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] arm: remove EISA kconfig option To: Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch , Linux-MIPS , Linux Kbuild mailing list , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dominik Brodowski , Alex Bounine , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev , linux-arm-kernel Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:06 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > No arm config enables EISA, and arm does not include drivers/eisa/Kconfig > which provides support for things like PCI to EISA bridges, so it is most > likely dead. As I said before, this is absolutely dead. Only the difference between arch/powerpc/Kconfig and arch/arm/Kconfig is the presence of ---help--- property. I squashed this to "eisa: consolidate EISA ..." > Suggested-by: Masahiro Yamada > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > arch/arm/Kconfig | 15 --------------- > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > index 91be74d8df65..f24a7435d19a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > @@ -163,21 +163,6 @@ config HAVE_PROC_CPU > config NO_IOPORT_MAP > bool > > -config EISA > - bool > - ---help--- > - The Extended Industry Standard Architecture (EISA) bus was > - developed as an open alternative to the IBM MicroChannel bus. > - > - The EISA bus provided some of the features of the IBM MicroChannel > - bus while maintaining backward compatibility with cards made for > - the older ISA bus. The EISA bus saw limited use between 1988 and > - 1995 when it was made obsolete by the PCI bus. > - > - Say Y here if you are building a kernel for an EISA-based machine. > - > - Otherwise, say N. > - > config SBUS > bool > > -- > 2.19.1 > -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yamada.masahiro@socionext.com (Masahiro Yamada) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:38:20 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 1/9] arm: remove EISA kconfig option In-Reply-To: <20181115190538.17016-2-hch@lst.de> References: <20181115190538.17016-1-hch@lst.de> <20181115190538.17016-2-hch@lst.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:06 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > No arm config enables EISA, and arm does not include drivers/eisa/Kconfig > which provides support for things like PCI to EISA bridges, so it is most > likely dead. As I said before, this is absolutely dead. Only the difference between arch/powerpc/Kconfig and arch/arm/Kconfig is the presence of ---help--- property. I squashed this to "eisa: consolidate EISA ..." > Suggested-by: Masahiro Yamada > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > arch/arm/Kconfig | 15 --------------- > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > index 91be74d8df65..f24a7435d19a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > @@ -163,21 +163,6 @@ config HAVE_PROC_CPU > config NO_IOPORT_MAP > bool > > -config EISA > - bool > - ---help--- > - The Extended Industry Standard Architecture (EISA) bus was > - developed as an open alternative to the IBM MicroChannel bus. > - > - The EISA bus provided some of the features of the IBM MicroChannel > - bus while maintaining backward compatibility with cards made for > - the older ISA bus. The EISA bus saw limited use between 1988 and > - 1995 when it was made obsolete by the PCI bus. > - > - Say Y here if you are building a kernel for an EISA-based machine. > - > - Otherwise, say N. > - > config SBUS > bool > > -- > 2.19.1 > -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada