From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D19C43331 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:22:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D542076F for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:22:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585070541; bh=rPZNWgIqDJSdIGBhxAarYEhP+ICwAfgI9o9ldX+Ii+Y=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=Nn/g6ggOVUuXa/vgZabyTgaU+sQo+sh07oBZPbwAdqa+6hvzzMkTqF9Z+CeglR6Y1 U4OsW3yFEz70mlFQxVAKfyPtb4AFrA0mBhGeNDFFj7g23/skCqw7tTiYXLRvNZXEJF 5W82FJM2ks1u4UYEsvypZ9+s+W0zD2CZX6fgHCe0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727267AbgCXRWS (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:22:18 -0400 Received: from conssluserg-05.nifty.com ([210.131.2.90]:51052 "EHLO conssluserg-05.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727223AbgCXRWS (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:22:18 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f48.google.com (mail-vs1-f48.google.com [209.85.217.48]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-05.nifty.com with ESMTP id 02OHM8hB027872; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 02:22:08 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-05.nifty.com 02OHM8hB027872 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1585070529; bh=bPCRwIwldAM4HwybdFdRYHiHqpgNqlDdX4WV8XKCpgQ=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=AAffemBMcj/pRI1GXSqDaRqeVNwXvSgGAJMx5lv0WUkBJKpxHMQEFBTQ0dSb77Th9 T/lQ+GowmCoBmXu38B/OVfdN0YCzrB3mzSJM3oGZa8d0WQjoGs70HLz8NIu2WXJZcs E7W81ziHmBmRtUTjyDJ2qQVpf0aR8G3kQGjPxyZpxf7Buqhfkq9xH5p+VVCouwqSW3 JcxYssSq/v1DpR8KH3LS+FGPkl6DH+jKdw1xVaiPpLmu6GHcecjAn47x2SGZ3yJmvp LMIpasWLGNKKsw5JHg5NblRyu1gd5qTxrZLTkxmoTX95kayf4As7oMIQ/99DjdU4Mh WPjtDq4IqCNeQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.217.48] Received: by mail-vs1-f48.google.com with SMTP id s10so3220589vsi.9; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:22:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3iI96xpUmSzkHLCOxQaJ1liDtLFrKe2XoX0rTcCieB70Grg8Eb vbxIPgG9glyydn5w3ive4YoH+iE7SARCXmYKYNA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtUc5X8HF0cd25yHwBLsXgCCmhP5dTghG8L4rR7TJM9y01vynxbjz5/o6OhEUXD89jZqGHaOyPYng8JpiRE1WA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:8745:: with SMTP id j66mr19305626vsd.181.1585070522434; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:22:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200324084821.29944-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> <20200324084821.29944-12-masahiroy@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 02:21:26 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] x86: probe assembler capabilities via kconfig instead of makefile To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Nick Desaulniers , LKML , "David S . Miller" , Linus Torvalds , Kees Cook , clang-built-linux , Herbert Xu , "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , "H . Peter Anvin" , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Linux Kbuild mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:17 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:01 AM Nick Desaulniers > wrote: > > > > Can 11 just be rebased with 8 dropped? > > 8 adds comments to one place. 11 moves them to another place, while > doing other things. > > Your desire is to skip the first step? I guess there's no problem with > this, but I'm curious to learn why. If desired, I will swap the order of 8 and 11. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from conssluserg-05.nifty.com ([210.131.2.90]:51052 "EHLO conssluserg-05.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727223AbgCXRWS (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:22:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200324084821.29944-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> <20200324084821.29944-12-masahiroy@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 02:21:26 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] x86: probe assembler capabilities via kconfig instead of makefile Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Nick Desaulniers , LKML , "David S . Miller" , Linus Torvalds , Kees Cook , clang-built-linux , Herbert Xu , "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , "H . Peter Anvin" , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Linux Kbuild mailing list On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:17 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:01 AM Nick Desaulniers > wrote: > > > > Can 11 just be rebased with 8 dropped? > > 8 adds comments to one place. 11 moves them to another place, while > doing other things. > > Your desire is to skip the first step? I guess there's no problem with > this, but I'm curious to learn why. If desired, I will swap the order of 8 and 11. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada