From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:32 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038 Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: y2038 Mailman List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Michal Simek , Paul Burton , Helge Deller , Michael Ellerman , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Rich Felker , "David S. Miller" , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > > > reason or another. > > > > > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > > > > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > > > Is that intentional? > > > > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I > > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with > > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in > > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both > > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit > > architectures, I can add that as well. > > Thanks, sounds fine to me. Just to be sure, you mean it's fine to not add it, not that we should add it? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACE0C43387 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EC52064C for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729596AbfAJWnw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:43:52 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com ([209.85.160.193]:36665 "EHLO mail-qt1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727721AbfAJWnv (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:43:51 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id t13so15886670qtn.3; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:43:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8BQxy77aw0o+DSOGQG1SQtIdLEpkaKMICEdNR1LQ13U=; b=ggAj9vAT5WGEP5ApMiqfssHwl/dQskyj+bcfmb5AyWMfmpvJhfuFkqioSyolrYc9TU gdqt7zFs0kD7jWxdbKppu/0pTxAnUVImUs9iDyCzknRrP0AxBYXc8kRInflA9zy3Z112 n1RP5F6pfwIDXh8n6ynSWC2mfGIkmy1/VHY59K7VDtLF5sFZObhPjYCa0CMcf2+AHn1V seXaixTmWE9NNv/IoaBeB8HOdGWPDjAZxpPNAXP+SxI6f7273l4H5iOnrX4it1yGlaLP ePVKxfucr2q4R0G3eUaOKDsmmEVPfsN6l6nisqAL+C8UaK0YtdyhCfY649wdgbhxpvo+ 3IvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdn5OtGQutjgGpwace7l1KpMatpHL+YqL6bOMj3FlnWQ18sYvDT GE9Q7M3RoUIJBOMwPbHumEHwkDQpDSjeJCDd+RQArg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6HaEyY/0zx6RGqFtKtlSPz+RZx+KrllRYiKjcCjzeA51uZ4VQUxl3HD7ARydoqD46n7kKW7Dhkol5Ir927zA4= X-Received: by 2002:ae9:d8c2:: with SMTP id u185mr10538686qkf.107.1547160230039; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:43:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:43:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038 To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: y2038 Mailman List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Michal Simek , Paul Burton , Helge Deller , Michael Ellerman , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Rich Felker , "David S. Miller" , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Max Filippov , Firoz Khan , "Eric W. Biederman" , Deepa Dinamani , Dominik Brodowski , Andrew Morton , Davidlohr Bueso , alpha , Linux ARM , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , linux-m68k , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Parisc List , linuxppc-dev , linux-s390 , Linux-sh list , sparclinux Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > > > reason or another. > > > > > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > > > > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > > > Is that intentional? > > > > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I > > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with > > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in > > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both > > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit > > architectures, I can add that as well. > > Thanks, sounds fine to me. Just to be sure, you mean it's fine to not add it, not that we should add it? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:43:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: y2038 Mailman List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Michal Simek , Paul Burton , Helge Deller , Michael Ellerman , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Rich Felker , "David S. Miller" , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > > > reason or another. > > > > > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > > > > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > > > Is that intentional? > > > > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I > > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with > > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in > > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both > > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit > > architectures, I can add that as well. > > Thanks, sounds fine to me. Just to be sure, you mean it's fine to not add it, not that we should add it? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D856AC43387 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59C8D2064C for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:46:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 59C8D2064C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43bLhw2LXdzDqsQ for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:46:56 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=209.85.160.193; helo=mail-qt1-f193.google.com; envelope-from=arndbergmann@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com (mail-qt1-f193.google.com [209.85.160.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43bLdN0PxpzDqwb for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:43:52 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id t33so15871382qtt.4 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:43:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8BQxy77aw0o+DSOGQG1SQtIdLEpkaKMICEdNR1LQ13U=; b=Dm9QgslPXcMrU6aUmGPvAf9qbTKRFBu/B0hw9wDP07eamccypEv/XB6/ZShKHMGIU3 p9vc+9jRqDZTpw6XmgmXKxGrwSlK1KsB1OyN7TxAnCnxU3UaqV+Y3W2S1FZ2LolB6n15 laUUv6LBxz9hF6f2KpuZ1Th7lvMFaKhxfRC2Zizp+wDQRUCstuP/7Fu1q9F6c8GVGr5M kyMwBoFV2MydFR0Dq2rOkGgD/rj9qD4/oLx+pi65EUU9LmTGTbVZlgSUb97tUiHR6XsS WUm7Hxd/+ho3mcOuKmNj8+rlVSh7ueqCkPDY53VgpbC+ItN/1MR9S8maSo/sBOrx+t2A VGng== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukff9Mmb35LL7YCP9i7AlFLhrukCEakWmXjXUXKTkqJUS0U1XG0m yDGN2VvIjZ4BJQ3ATBOFVtjLqgukeGOttSKsAkw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6HaEyY/0zx6RGqFtKtlSPz+RZx+KrllRYiKjcCjzeA51uZ4VQUxl3HD7ARydoqD46n7kKW7Dhkol5Ir927zA4= X-Received: by 2002:ae9:d8c2:: with SMTP id u185mr10538686qkf.107.1547160230039; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:43:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:43:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038 To: Geert Uytterhoeven Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Catalin Marinas , Heiko Carstens , Dominik Brodowski , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Deepa Dinamani , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux , linux-s390 , Davidlohr Bueso , y2038 Mailman List , Helge Deller , the arch/x86 maintainers , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , Firoz Khan , Matt Turner , Fenghua Yu , Will Deacon , linux-m68k , Ivan Kokshaysky , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM , Michal Simek , Tony Luck , Parisc List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Burton , "Eric W. Biederman" , alpha , Martin Schwidefsky , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev , "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > > > reason or another. > > > > > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > > > > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > > > Is that intentional? > > > > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I > > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with > > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in > > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both > > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit > > architectures, I can add that as well. > > Thanks, sounds fine to me. Just to be sure, you mean it's fine to not add it, not that we should add it? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37B7C43612 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C19D7214C6 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ViIlRQvs" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C19D7214C6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=yadL7JPsU/cmedRAzokP72amwUA3YZ3UJEvv7R8dfn4=; b=ViIlRQvs/x3FQD 1PruZwbEtqJINVUIx4tMhokdL3sdlEklFN9ciTWKsRkXsBn03LjAtH41zrap2h/yZRWeC2OiLZnIn x5P285Gl26FZ0S7pkXUQ8Mq2hf5GLCPfOJrmz4bKgm5pkDJlZJYKEkn1AjkhoaERXLMDhMZDmID/p 3dea08CD7Ch6gT2ju83cRAlAp7G3jHbmDRu25+KBcePfllOQZOPHCjpksldOV3fOhi4jaJ/dlzsmB Hr0Kgg0Aum6o6VQ0BuY01Xb4rXOAOAnb8XApg9MdCIgjHpEuFLuPRWfDSoEoH6fbZ1lNxunlUs4m5 pf1gWZrWL5Df4QSOCIYA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghj3K-0008Ip-N7; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:54 +0000 Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com ([209.85.160.195]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghj3H-0008IJ-7o for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:52 +0000 Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id l11so15904706qtp.0 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:43:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8BQxy77aw0o+DSOGQG1SQtIdLEpkaKMICEdNR1LQ13U=; b=N7lwu4D8aNZiCcL90YG5LCDNeJHUbXMnqGb32NJagDZY2pV531JcDan8PrFcEiTozH A/83la4DVU8WnKwiqa+epAPSQJG75jVTi0M+euCBOtIXzFLfZ0A8klREu0h0tfeGyj1I 6ZWkXTSElSWMzIK3BQ4HptZZRP73kxFlSsjke04rp7Hn5Q1knP0Xki8SwnAmpf532ArM ZyEpI12p4BcvAff74zwpuU2en+FosuT4/Tq3IaeSLtugIeA9xRZFt8U7OdWHtNO7arOu ez05yVo8qjL5lAxhpOTLai+42tbedA5wTawo17d0HOY7kn0fT9KXnZLvt/aYOnjbt9+N 3b4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcQ6fKlXdVN7MJqoUnTvt8LK2p0Pcj/RgvXHuWiJafCoHhvHSjH IY5XKHm1iTMIwVPgXeCUWuupa//arZbJKt1Wx48= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6HaEyY/0zx6RGqFtKtlSPz+RZx+KrllRYiKjcCjzeA51uZ4VQUxl3HD7ARydoqD46n7kKW7Dhkol5Ir927zA4= X-Received: by 2002:ae9:d8c2:: with SMTP id u185mr10538686qkf.107.1547160230039; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:43:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:43:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038 To: Geert Uytterhoeven X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190110_144351_279323_FE85C7EB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.02 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Catalin Marinas , Heiko Carstens , Dominik Brodowski , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Deepa Dinamani , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux , linux-s390 , Davidlohr Bueso , y2038 Mailman List , Michael Ellerman , Helge Deller , the arch/x86 maintainers , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , Firoz Khan , Matt Turner , Fenghua Yu , Will Deacon , linux-m68k , Ivan Kokshaysky , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM , Michal Simek , Tony Luck , Parisc List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Burton , "Eric W. Biederman" , alpha , Martin Schwidefsky , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev , "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > > > reason or another. > > > > > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > > > > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > > > Is that intentional? > > > > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I > > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with > > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in > > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both > > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit > > architectures, I can add that as well. > > Thanks, sounds fine to me. Just to be sure, you mean it's fine to not add it, not that we should add it? Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel