All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Surprising code generated for vdso_read_begin()
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:52:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0SfCwP04CJPThCuDmngGhwtejN8Px_UQpSwi=s_ww=bw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <305fcee5-2e1b-ea4d-9a2a-a0e8034d40a8@c-s.fr>

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:45 AM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
> Le 16/02/2020 à 19:10, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:33 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 07:45:44AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>> Le 09/01/2020 à 21:07, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >>>> It looks like the compiler did loop peeling.  What GCC version is this?
> >>>> Please try current trunk (to become GCC 10), or at least GCC 9?
> >>>
> >>> It is with GCC 5.5
> >>>
> >>> https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ doesn't have more
> >>> recent than 8.1
> >>
> >> Arnd, can you update the tools?  We are at 8.3 and 9.2 now :-)  Or is
> >> this hard and/or painful to do?
> >
> > To follow up on this older thread, I have now uploaded 6.5, 7.5, 8.3 and 9.2
> > binaries, as well as a recent 10.0 snapshot.
> >
>
> Thanks Arnd,
>
> I have built the VDSO with 9.2, I get less performant result than with
> 8.2 (same performance as with 5.5).
>
> After a quick look, I see:
> - Irrelevant NOPs to align loops and stuff, allthough -mpcu=860 should
> avoid that.
> - A stack frame is set for saving r31 in __c_kernel_clock_gettime. GCC
> 8.1 don't need that, all VDSO functions are frameless with 8.1

If you think it should be fixed in gcc, maybe try to reproduce it in
https://godbolt.org/ and open a gcc bug against that.

Also, please try the gcc-10 snapshot, which has the highest chance
of getting fixes if it shows the same issue (or worse).

     Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Surprising code generated for vdso_read_begin()
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:52:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0SfCwP04CJPThCuDmngGhwtejN8Px_UQpSwi=s_ww=bw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <305fcee5-2e1b-ea4d-9a2a-a0e8034d40a8@c-s.fr>

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:45 AM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
> Le 16/02/2020 à 19:10, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:33 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 07:45:44AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>> Le 09/01/2020 à 21:07, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >>>> It looks like the compiler did loop peeling.  What GCC version is this?
> >>>> Please try current trunk (to become GCC 10), or at least GCC 9?
> >>>
> >>> It is with GCC 5.5
> >>>
> >>> https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ doesn't have more
> >>> recent than 8.1
> >>
> >> Arnd, can you update the tools?  We are at 8.3 and 9.2 now :-)  Or is
> >> this hard and/or painful to do?
> >
> > To follow up on this older thread, I have now uploaded 6.5, 7.5, 8.3 and 9.2
> > binaries, as well as a recent 10.0 snapshot.
> >
>
> Thanks Arnd,
>
> I have built the VDSO with 9.2, I get less performant result than with
> 8.2 (same performance as with 5.5).
>
> After a quick look, I see:
> - Irrelevant NOPs to align loops and stuff, allthough -mpcu=860 should
> avoid that.
> - A stack frame is set for saving r31 in __c_kernel_clock_gettime. GCC
> 8.1 don't need that, all VDSO functions are frameless with 8.1

If you think it should be fixed in gcc, maybe try to reproduce it in
https://godbolt.org/ and open a gcc bug against that.

Also, please try the gcc-10 snapshot, which has the highest chance
of getting fixes if it shows the same issue (or worse).

     Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Surprising code generated for vdso_read_begin()
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:52:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0SfCwP04CJPThCuDmngGhwtejN8Px_UQpSwi=s_ww=bw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <305fcee5-2e1b-ea4d-9a2a-a0e8034d40a8@c-s.fr>

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:45 AM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
> Le 16/02/2020 à 19:10, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:33 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 07:45:44AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>> Le 09/01/2020 à 21:07, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >>>> It looks like the compiler did loop peeling.  What GCC version is this?
> >>>> Please try current trunk (to become GCC 10), or at least GCC 9?
> >>>
> >>> It is with GCC 5.5
> >>>
> >>> https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ doesn't have more
> >>> recent than 8.1
> >>
> >> Arnd, can you update the tools?  We are at 8.3 and 9.2 now :-)  Or is
> >> this hard and/or painful to do?
> >
> > To follow up on this older thread, I have now uploaded 6.5, 7.5, 8.3 and 9.2
> > binaries, as well as a recent 10.0 snapshot.
> >
>
> Thanks Arnd,
>
> I have built the VDSO with 9.2, I get less performant result than with
> 8.2 (same performance as with 5.5).
>
> After a quick look, I see:
> - Irrelevant NOPs to align loops and stuff, allthough -mpcu=860 should
> avoid that.
> - A stack frame is set for saving r31 in __c_kernel_clock_gettime. GCC
> 8.1 don't need that, all VDSO functions are frameless with 8.1

If you think it should be fixed in gcc, maybe try to reproduce it in
https://godbolt.org/ and open a gcc bug against that.

Also, please try the gcc-10 snapshot, which has the highest chance
of getting fixes if it shows the same issue (or worse).

     Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-19  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-23 14:31 [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] powerpc/32: switch VDSO to C implementation Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] lib: vdso: ensure all arches have 32bit fallback Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  2:07   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:07     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:07     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-10 20:56     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 20:56       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 20:56       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 21:02       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-10 21:02         ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-10 21:02         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-25  2:05   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-25  6:01   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-30 12:27   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-30 12:27     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-30 12:27     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-02 11:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-02 11:29       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-02 11:29       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-09 15:43       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-09 15:43         ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-09 15:43         ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] lib: vdso: move call to fallback out of common code Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  2:24   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:24     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:24     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 11:41     ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:41       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:41       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 12:09       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:09         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:09         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-25  2:19   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] lib: vdso: Change __cvdso_clock_gettime/getres_common() to __cvdso_clock_gettime/getres() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] lib: vdso: get pointer to vdso data from the arch Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  2:27   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:27     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:27     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 11:53     ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:53       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:53       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 12:15       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:15         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:15         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:41         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:41           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:41           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 14:46         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-12-24 14:46           ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-12-24 14:46           ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] lib: vdso: inline do_hres() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  2:29   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:29     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:29     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-30 12:07   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-30 12:07     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-30 12:07     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-10 21:07     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 21:07       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 21:07       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-11  9:06       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11  9:06         ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11  9:06         ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] lib: vdso: make do_coarse() return 0 Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] lib: vdso: don't use READ_ONCE() in __c_kernel_time() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  1:58   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  1:58     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  1:58     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 11:12     ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:12       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:12       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 12:04       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:04         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:04         ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-10 21:12   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 21:12     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 21:12     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-11  8:05     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11  8:05       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11  8:05       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11 11:07       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-11 11:07         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-11 11:07         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-13  6:52         ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-13  6:52           ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-13  6:52           ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] lib: vdso: Avoid duplication in __cvdso_clock_getres() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  1:59   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  1:59     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  1:59     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] powerpc/vdso32: inline __get_datapage() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] powerpc/32: Switch VDSO to C implementation Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-25  6:54   ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-09 17:52 ` Surprising code generated for vdso_read_begin() Christophe Leroy
2020-01-09 20:07   ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-09 20:07     ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-09 20:07     ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-10  6:45     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-10  6:45       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-10  6:45       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11 11:33       ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-11 11:33         ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-11 11:33         ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-16 18:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-16 18:10           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-16 18:10           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-19  8:45           ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-19  8:45             ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-19  8:45             ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-19  9:52             ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2020-02-19  9:52               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-19  9:52               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-19 13:08               ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-19 13:08                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-19 13:08                 ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK8P3a0SfCwP04CJPThCuDmngGhwtejN8Px_UQpSwi=s_ww=bw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.