From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: y2038 Mailman List <y2038@lists.linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:H8/300 ARCHITECTURE"
<uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] asm-generic: Make time32 syscall numbers optional
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:29:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0UD7_omc4=o7VLaLKUX4Z1eWXU15TeqgvjXfhyv+7xCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVbz=_GFMnKx4PuxpmG9jpdA=Do2XnR3bY5wRZPM3G+Gw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:06 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:34 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > We don't want new architectures to even provide the old 32-bit time_t
> > based system calls any more, or define the syscall number macros.
> >
> > Add a new __ARCH_WANT_TIME32_SYSCALLS macro that gets enabled for all
> > existing 32-bit architectures so we don't change any current behavior.
>
> ... (only) 32-bit architectures using the generic syscall list, right?
Correct, I've added a clarification in the commit text in my git tree now,
thanks for the proofreading!
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:H8/300 ARCHITECTURE"
<uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@lists.linaro.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>, Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] asm-generic: Make time32 syscall numbers optional
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:29:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0UD7_omc4=o7VLaLKUX4Z1eWXU15TeqgvjXfhyv+7xCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVbz=_GFMnKx4PuxpmG9jpdA=Do2XnR3bY5wRZPM3G+Gw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:06 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:34 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > We don't want new architectures to even provide the old 32-bit time_t
> > based system calls any more, or define the syscall number macros.
> >
> > Add a new __ARCH_WANT_TIME32_SYSCALLS macro that gets enabled for all
> > existing 32-bit architectures so we don't change any current behavior.
>
> ... (only) 32-bit architectures using the generic syscall list, right?
Correct, I've added a clarification in the commit text in my git tree now,
thanks for the proofreading!
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:H8/300 ARCHITECTURE"
<uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@lists.linaro.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>, Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] asm-generic: Make time32 syscall numbers optional
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:29:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0UD7_omc4=o7VLaLKUX4Z1eWXU15TeqgvjXfhyv+7xCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVbz=_GFMnKx4PuxpmG9jpdA=Do2XnR3bY5wRZPM3G+Gw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:06 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:34 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > We don't want new architectures to even provide the old 32-bit time_t
> > based system calls any more, or define the syscall number macros.
> >
> > Add a new __ARCH_WANT_TIME32_SYSCALLS macro that gets enabled for all
> > existing 32-bit architectures so we don't change any current behavior.
>
> ... (only) 32-bit architectures using the generic syscall list, right?
Correct, I've added a clarification in the commit text in my git tree now,
thanks for the proofreading!
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-19 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-18 21:07 [PATCH 0/8] y2038: remove time32 ABI on rv32 and csky Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/8] compat ABI: use non-compat openat and open_by_handle_at variants Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/8] 32-bit userspace ABI: introduce ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T config option Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 8:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-19 8:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-19 8:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-19 8:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-19 9:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 9:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 9:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 9:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/8] asm-generic: Drop getrlimit and setrlimit syscalls from default list Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/8] asm-generic: Make time32 syscall numbers optional Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 20:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-19 20:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-19 20:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-19 20:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-19 20:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-19 20:29 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2019-02-19 20:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 20:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 20:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` [PATCH 5/8] unicore32: Fix __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 definition Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` [PATCH 6/8] checksyscalls: fix up mq_timedreceive and stat exceptions Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` [PATCH 7/8] csky: Use latest system call ABI Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 22:40 ` Joseph Myers
2019-02-18 22:40 ` Joseph Myers
2019-02-18 22:40 ` Joseph Myers
2019-02-18 22:40 ` Joseph Myers
2019-02-19 2:18 ` Guo Ren
2019-02-19 2:18 ` Guo Ren
2019-02-19 2:18 ` Guo Ren
2019-02-19 9:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 9:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 9:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 9:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` [PATCH 8/8] riscv: " Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-25 19:19 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK8P3a0UD7_omc4=o7VLaLKUX4Z1eWXU15TeqgvjXfhyv+7xCA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=gxt@pku.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
--cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
--cc=y2038@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.