From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752573AbdFNV4m (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:56:42 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com ([209.85.218.53]:34465 "EHLO mail-oi0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751606AbdFNV4l (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:56:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170614212834.mtmq3wlnq525qkiz@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> References: <20170614211556.2062728-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20170614211556.2062728-4-arnd@arndb.de> <20170614212834.mtmq3wlnq525qkiz@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 23:56:39 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 45Kg7V0xcnHVjXXLgrqLdqECiBQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] tty: kbd: reduce stack size with KASAN To: Samuel Thibault , Arnd Bergmann , Andrew Morton , kasan-dev , Dmitry Vyukov , Alexander Potapenko , Andrey Ryabinin , Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arend van Spriel , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Dmitry Torokhov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Arnd Bergmann, on mer. 14 juin 2017 23:15:38 +0200, wrote: >> As reported by kernelci, some functions in the VT code use significant >> amounts of kernel stack when local variables get inlined into the caller >> multiple times: >> >> drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c: In function 'kbd_keycode': >> drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c:1452:1: error: the frame size of 2240 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] >> >> Annotating those functions as noinline_if_stackbloat prevents the inlining >> and reduces the overall stack usage in this driver. > > >> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c >> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c >> @@ -301,13 +301,13 @@ int kbd_rate(struct kbd_repeat *rpt) >> /* >> * Helper Functions. >> */ >> -static void put_queue(struct vc_data *vc, int ch) >> +static noinline_if_stackbloat void put_queue(struct vc_data *vc, int ch) >> { >> tty_insert_flip_char(&vc->port, ch, 0); >> tty_schedule_flip(&vc->port); >> } > > I'm surprised that this be able generate so much stack use: the > tty_insert_flip_char inline only uses a pointer and an int. > > And I'm surprised that multiple inlines can accumulate stack usage. The reason is that CONFIG_KASAN forces each local variable to have a separate location on the stack whenever it gets passed into an external function (tty_insert_flip_string_flags in this case), so the sanitizer is able to report exactly which instance caused the problem. > I however agree that it's a bad idea to inline it in functions where > it's called so many times (and we're talking about the keyboard anyway). > >> -static void puts_queue(struct vc_data *vc, char *cp) >> +static noinline_if_stackbloat void puts_queue(struct vc_data *vc, char *cp) > > I don't see why, it's only called once in the callers. k_fn, however, is > called several times in k_pad, so that could be why, but then it's > rather be the inlining of k_fn which is a bad idea. It's called by applkey, which in turn is called by k_pad(), and this all gets inlined by default. >> -static void fn_send_intr(struct vc_data *vc) >> +static noinline_if_stackbloat void fn_send_intr(struct vc_data *vc) > > This one is only referenced, not called, I don't see how that could pose > problem. I was surprised by this as well, but it seems that gcc these days is smart enough to turn the indirect function calls for k_handler[type] and/or f_handler[value] into inlines again when it has already determined the index to be constant. It's been a while since I looked at the patch, and I'd have to disassemble it again to figure out the details, but I'm pretty sure I needed this to get the stack usage down to normal levels. Arnd