From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] parisc: uapi header and system call table file generation Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:07:18 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1538975801-13735-1-git-send-email-firoz.khan@linaro.org> <1538975801-13735-5-git-send-email-firoz.khan@linaro.org> <20181009201321.GA28911@ls3530.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Helge Deller , Parisc List , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Thomas Gleixner , gregkh , Philippe Ombredanne , Kate Stewart , y2038 Mailman List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arch , Deepa Dinamani , Marcin Juszkiewicz To: Firoz Khan Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:10 AM Firoz Khan wrote: > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 01:48, Helge Deller wrote: > > > > * Firoz Khan : > > > System call table generation script must be run to generate > > > unistd_32/64.h and syscall_table_32/64/c32.h files. This patch > > > will have changes which will invokes the script. > > > > > > This patch will generate unistd_32/64.h and syscall_table_ > > > 32/64/c32.h files by the syscall table generation script > > > invoked by arch/parisc/Makefile and the generated files against > > > the removed files will be identical. > > > > > > The generated uapi header file will be included in uapi/asm/ > > > unistd_32/64.h and generated system call table support file will > > > be included by arch/sparc/kernel/syscall_table_32/64.S file. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Firoz Khan > > > --- > > > arch/parisc/Makefile | 4 + > > > arch/parisc/include/asm/Kbuild | 3 + > > > arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild | 2 + > > > arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 373 +-------------------------- > > > arch/parisc/kernel/syscall.S | 12 +- > > > arch/parisc/kernel/syscall_table.S | 459 ---------------------------------- > > > > > > Can we please get rid of those two new files: > > Yes, we don't need those files some of the architecture and other > architecture does have same/similar files. That's why I added below > files, so every architecture implementation looks same. > > I feel it is better to remove these files. > Arnd, Do u have any comment on this? I agree with Helge. This was a big different in a previous version where you generated the syscall_table.S file from syscalls.tbl, but now that you generade the syscall_table.h file instead, we no longer need to keep the .S file synchronized across architectures. Having a separate .S file would make it easier to replace that with a .c file later, but it's also easier to split it out after your series than as part of it. Arnd