From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717DEC49ED7 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED3E2184D for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389968AbfIPQ3t (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:29:49 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com ([209.85.208.194]:38852 "EHLO mail-lj1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727928AbfIPQ3t (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:29:49 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id y23so556083ljn.5 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:29:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h7narMV9OTYNzOroVWgFd4nRfpeAHkS1DELxNwsQgU8=; b=Jpu6K3gyTTR08ClLo50pc+QB7ojG2xHfUKt/66SvkrjYKNv/WrdrqPep0DNH+rR1Z+ 69RUjZPS2BsoQOAsbiVRG3Yl9w3GCd3s8inPytWxwEHAFbG2QgHHR2F1GIZHDySnCyIn RNaT/0AQnEyrcJeRa6SgigrRYoSWiZcP0n7TnZeOKl48wEcLmOXhV5vCGDlxSOdJdZ2A 7aA+nCaZUUMEfuXwIvvY4Gw+WF4q9RuuBqgQjSPyOYYB4pqzpa3jtFA5mQ6mQ1cK166f SNI2N+mSWY08xPiJQo0xnLx4AOVe1siPoe2jvhow3R3T7W9esGEsHwX5//T9P6Jb5Zwx POJg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU7YUA55TRd4b1hEnRYqkDWn6fdgY50aWfa5m0XCiZYh4caLRLF 0gBvpsaboamAlVzSNmcXVBgbZUe+lTFfwoM/RxA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMsOkcphhHTKrF/EiIRSmSKA/fSeeY5GxccGZwHcDrzfqwChNKVRKp/+O1sWchWQ8cn4aBT54W+P4bLyjfZG0= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a316:: with SMTP id l22mr101468lje.211.1568651386857; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:29:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20190914152544.GA17499@roeck-us.net> <056ccf5c-6c6c-090b-6ca1-ab666021db48@roeck-us.net> <20190916134920.GA18267@ulmo> <20190916154336.GA6628@roeck-us.net> <20190916155031.GE7488@ulmo> In-Reply-To: <20190916155031.GE7488@ulmo> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:29:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart() To: Thierry Reding Cc: Guenter Roeck , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:50 PM Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:43:36AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 06:17:01AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On 9/16/19 12:49 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 5:26 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > > > From: Thierry Reding > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This small series is preparatory work for a series that I'm working on > > > > > > > which attempts to establish a formal framework for system restart and > > > > > > > power off. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guenter has done a lot of good work in this area, but it never got > > > > > > > merged. I think this set is a valuable addition to the kernel because > > > > > > > it converts all odd providers to the established mechanism for restart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since this is stretched across both 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, as well as > > > > > > > PSCI, and given the SoC/board level of functionality, I think it might > > > > > > > make sense to take this through the ARM SoC tree in order to simplify > > > > > > > the interdependencies. But it should also be possible to take patches > > > > > > > 1-4 via their respective trees this cycle and patches 5-6 through the > > > > > > > ARM and arm64 trees for the next cycle, if that's preferred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We tried this twice now, and it seems to go nowhere. What does it take > > > > > > to get it applied ? > > > > > > > > > > Can you send a pull request to soc@kernel.org after the merge window, > > > > > with everyone else on Cc? If nobody objects, I'll merge it through > > > > > the soc tree. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure, I'll rebase and do that. > > > > > > I've uploaded a rebased tree here: > > > > > > https://github.com/thierryreding/linux/tree/for-5.5/system-power-reset > > > > > > The first 6 patches in that tree correspond to this series. There were a > > > couple of conflicts I had to resolve and I haven't fully tested the > > > series yet, but if you haven't done any of the rebasing, the above may > > > be useful to you. > > > > > > > Maybe Arnd can just use your branch (or rather part of it if you would > > split it off) since you already did the work ? The branch needs to be rebased once more as it is currently based on linux-next. > Yeah, I can just send the pull request for the 6 patches after -rc1. Ok, sounds good. I'm also happy to take the remaining patches in that branch, for the other architectures. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEEFC49ED7 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D15A2184D for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="i0TcQ7gT" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9D15A2184D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=TOsh07fWXnmCVQLCbHYOPBYLo5KwBQXAwpcc357NpW0=; b=i0TcQ7gTB1CMvz vSQkS4As4PAF22TQ8fqZWyT8mZCkyfpvCJ5cIi4grfG5+jndFHhASM33P98kDLlTwLpHtbdxWeyCm I1wgxKRfgP2nN1cFJLUWfVSwSL0QYIaKA39fV95G8F32XpxXPML/pbEQ6lEwubkLfYWsrqIChyulY pzG3MnlcjyA7F/HFC2Zr6rMG/0y5TSSwPvw7ekdEKpMI4noA+TmkOXI9Xc7QUrHaBAGBcp9PcXmwC 5mbXL4okEfNGPb+88218yTp1un1tXGgJ50pekBEl8+6rNivWWiyfJ2LUsv3i5u6aau0Kf+mOFX23i /RGwt07GpZ3wMIarBjJQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i9tsx-00030L-TQ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:29:55 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i9tsq-0002yk-Mr for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:29:54 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id 7so540578ljw.7 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:29:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h7narMV9OTYNzOroVWgFd4nRfpeAHkS1DELxNwsQgU8=; b=MdVIXUpc9/YU8wr1GzvXXgtQb0JM41RgAsovteHxEROK52BQ+1LWLmENuD03+XBTNz 4zM9dDaJu0OeYYb0b/TeElwAfS7X8Ke/9fHmODo3ASbKAP2cUwDT+UbH1hVxkqivle5D kwoD+navaP8FbSQ+5Itiv/im8KAgDYyUiKiv1u2ImZwBHpHtIUIHDldNd6WUs+IfoBOj FZhR5c2ErUj0Og1SsvF6S4TVROQH/wrV0AUbqQT1M8hleXbr/vllvJAV0OwB/xMoZ8/g uDEKB+Z8Gt60X7afIucL9CuEVNdW2H5/Gx2xSLQr7QomZYaZX4loKwobDqmiv/8kzPQ4 n9gg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVH/Q1f8gPblxq+05XXVhFAD/hGi2gxsUc9X/K7Wu11IWg4ruGH 2uua8jZHfq1ewfWYXwc8VV/+v+ARFNnaOcIB5JK+NOYK X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMsOkcphhHTKrF/EiIRSmSKA/fSeeY5GxccGZwHcDrzfqwChNKVRKp/+O1sWchWQ8cn4aBT54W+P4bLyjfZG0= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a316:: with SMTP id l22mr101468lje.211.1568651386857; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:29:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20190914152544.GA17499@roeck-us.net> <056ccf5c-6c6c-090b-6ca1-ab666021db48@roeck-us.net> <20190916134920.GA18267@ulmo> <20190916154336.GA6628@roeck-us.net> <20190916155031.GE7488@ulmo> In-Reply-To: <20190916155031.GE7488@ulmo> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:29:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart() To: Thierry Reding X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190916_092948_744000_A859CCB4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.12 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux ARM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Guenter Roeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:50 PM Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:43:36AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 06:17:01AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On 9/16/19 12:49 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 5:26 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > > > From: Thierry Reding > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This small series is preparatory work for a series that I'm working on > > > > > > > which attempts to establish a formal framework for system restart and > > > > > > > power off. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guenter has done a lot of good work in this area, but it never got > > > > > > > merged. I think this set is a valuable addition to the kernel because > > > > > > > it converts all odd providers to the established mechanism for restart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since this is stretched across both 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, as well as > > > > > > > PSCI, and given the SoC/board level of functionality, I think it might > > > > > > > make sense to take this through the ARM SoC tree in order to simplify > > > > > > > the interdependencies. But it should also be possible to take patches > > > > > > > 1-4 via their respective trees this cycle and patches 5-6 through the > > > > > > > ARM and arm64 trees for the next cycle, if that's preferred. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We tried this twice now, and it seems to go nowhere. What does it take > > > > > > to get it applied ? > > > > > > > > > > Can you send a pull request to soc@kernel.org after the merge window, > > > > > with everyone else on Cc? If nobody objects, I'll merge it through > > > > > the soc tree. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure, I'll rebase and do that. > > > > > > I've uploaded a rebased tree here: > > > > > > https://github.com/thierryreding/linux/tree/for-5.5/system-power-reset > > > > > > The first 6 patches in that tree correspond to this series. There were a > > > couple of conflicts I had to resolve and I haven't fully tested the > > > series yet, but if you haven't done any of the rebasing, the above may > > > be useful to you. > > > > > > > Maybe Arnd can just use your branch (or rather part of it if you would > > split it off) since you already did the work ? The branch needs to be rebased once more as it is currently based on linux-next. > Yeah, I can just send the pull request for the 6 patches after -rc1. Ok, sounds good. I'm also happy to take the remaining patches in that branch, for the other architectures. Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel