From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB176C433FF for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 07:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88E5205F4 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 07:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730012AbfHAHdk (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 03:33:40 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f194.google.com ([209.85.222.194]:43253 "EHLO mail-qk1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725946AbfHAHdk (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 03:33:40 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f194.google.com with SMTP id m14so25541015qka.10; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:33:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uzHxuqP9bTvMw7JBQ/Id5Vam5w5HBpX0XWumLmps/F8=; b=a2zwqHyjT8P+fvFrSFEOJ3Z1sbAqdsA2LP5g/lQoCinOhcUXP7sYyD11Wo60055Sut EunN2tSpc0ixremLnzzmIt3Q/qJEdxpJOHqgoZN6hk2YXuU0hrwP6WXeY1m/k4fzlw/F +DIAGrpnBnVrtnL/kZDuiTI4DfCNnBPgeElRwS5SUEhge1RgQokuqsUmM6YgBys7va57 0X5Qle87sSRyXQ1OHv94ddtqARdJfTvcugTjTHNEVyIXhFxD0vcdTfm2AeZAhoSldzI9 NhNMtU7wkxW9e+CZ/LJN7wg1gKdPv+knC0RL0DPFUGkegJO5xF733jO3d8GxGCYgsGF9 kU3A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU8B+qBWNdUE6ia99zmQpQswSTH9EbLvTEXCtYa2Y/Mc46yDQ5x 0If5aJq5SFXeVKQU8sxPUArwBNtG6CMFeWVzE8c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyMeJ9LlJMXE9rDAXSa0/HHTUU6jsIhO5Y0qQu+ABh/obgCJKyAqVIsLutAY+sl9DXQqRxphmZCeAPnr5ENpd8= X-Received: by 2002:a37:5f45:: with SMTP id t66mr84886325qkb.286.1564644819429; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:33:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190731195713.3150463-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190731225303.GC1330@shell.armlinux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20190731225303.GC1330@shell.armlinux.org.uk> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 09:33:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] ARM: move lpc32xx and dove to multiplatform To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: soc@kernel.org, Linux ARM , Vladimir Zapolskiy , Sylvain Lemieux , Gregory Clement , Linus Walleij , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , "David S. Miller" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , Guenter Roeck , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Networking , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, USB list , LINUXWATCHDOG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:53 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:56:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > For dove, the patches are basically what I had proposed back in > > 2015 when all other ARMv6/ARMv7 machines became part of a single > > kernel build. I don't know what the state is mach-dove support is, > > compared to the DT based support in mach-mvebu for the same > > hardware. If they are functionally the same, we could also just > > remove mach-dove rather than applying my patches. > > Well, the good news is that I'm down to a small board support file > for the Dove Cubox now - but the bad news is, that there's still a > board support file necessary to support everything the Dove SoC has > to offer. > > Even for a DT based Dove Cubox, I'm still using mach-dove, but it > may be possible to drop most of mach-dove now. Without spending a > lot of time digging through it, it's impossible to really know. Ok, so we won't remove it then, but I'd like to merge my patches to at least get away from the special case of requiring a separate kernel image for it. Can you try if applying patches 12 and 14 from my series causes problems for you? (it may be easier to apply the entire set or pull from [1] to avoid rebase conflicts). Arnd [1] kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/playground.git mach-cleanup-5.4 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236A5C433FF for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 07:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB89C205F4 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 07:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="DQa8MRD3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EB89C205F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Bb712OlszYy28GXfBZl69QubQuKvTfKVa03UIDJ6Azo=; b=DQa8MRD3dVVlc6 9uEeAOwXmtVXPtJe11zu1MHneyTz24RdaUKRkCUT8MQO6YGa+DakH4PkcMoqEO8VmOWaUrPr5xEtJ 5ofTLCunrWWbRook5EiB3prfE7GXH/gDFX73C01NHxPNtEU2t7JGpQlV89IrK9pnRUORd3fbGoe5T 2rYMMu+paCWn0jzF0W/U5o0j10yPB4DfmLCAJM+eHbrcjET2o6V588W5fSdNlNmAO2/K7FKpgOTk8 fr5VsybosonwEU4VJbanVl0WqFth/6vmcsbgDPafVeUw+w9qqUErSkaO8/WmSFczX8nDJgKNoyw+e YKk8RrxuujBjMrMoscqQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ht5aq-0001G1-C3; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 07:33:44 +0000 Received: from mail-qk1-f196.google.com ([209.85.222.196]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ht5an-0001FV-II for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 07:33:42 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-f196.google.com with SMTP id r4so51155900qkm.13 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:33:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uzHxuqP9bTvMw7JBQ/Id5Vam5w5HBpX0XWumLmps/F8=; b=kp9PRdluUpuqwaYFhMoLaRjd0QUlulrFHXE5ajywMgBx5FSH5F3fUfHFrq44av/lRe M1zI7ZGGkx0oEgnGcUBUzbONnn3pBOQlbJz4omDhxwl13axjtJEP3Lgn75VzRkTfVu5s ZQqaDUiWul21gRTXTaZxKR0N0cSqcb4S0lXt3akQVIQFMX50/MPkLIIxHmh0XUZ8mbWU GLjBxYR6ISTX85JrVkfAVAh6J3e3Iu5/2522GxpLfLYzMCtYJ+QMaEa1YltZBkSfpML3 49MN8awEDN5daAAQMxS9eLc8VYVtLQ2FIlcU8pzAAk936SWSrDqAB0sHLlK1f7Lz8UTy s09w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVCb9ng0W/EW/hXGNLqw00JYg6vjEbp/1JosIGxUSpXy8efTs2I JX+6cXD3yCSnmXrYBsENiIEyN+sbD2K4H/RgHtQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyMeJ9LlJMXE9rDAXSa0/HHTUU6jsIhO5Y0qQu+ABh/obgCJKyAqVIsLutAY+sl9DXQqRxphmZCeAPnr5ENpd8= X-Received: by 2002:a37:5f45:: with SMTP id t66mr84886325qkb.286.1564644819429; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:33:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190731195713.3150463-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190731225303.GC1330@shell.armlinux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20190731225303.GC1330@shell.armlinux.org.uk> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 09:33:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] ARM: move lpc32xx and dove to multiplatform To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190801_003341_609882_33A0FD24 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.96 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Andrew Lunn , LINUXWATCHDOG , Jason Cooper , "David S. Miller" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Walleij , USB list , Vladimir Zapolskiy , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , soc@kernel.org, Networking , Alan Stern , Guenter Roeck , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Sylvain Lemieux , Gregory Clement , Linux ARM , Sebastian Hesselbarth Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:53 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:56:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > For dove, the patches are basically what I had proposed back in > > 2015 when all other ARMv6/ARMv7 machines became part of a single > > kernel build. I don't know what the state is mach-dove support is, > > compared to the DT based support in mach-mvebu for the same > > hardware. If they are functionally the same, we could also just > > remove mach-dove rather than applying my patches. > > Well, the good news is that I'm down to a small board support file > for the Dove Cubox now - but the bad news is, that there's still a > board support file necessary to support everything the Dove SoC has > to offer. > > Even for a DT based Dove Cubox, I'm still using mach-dove, but it > may be possible to drop most of mach-dove now. Without spending a > lot of time digging through it, it's impossible to really know. Ok, so we won't remove it then, but I'd like to merge my patches to at least get away from the special case of requiring a separate kernel image for it. Can you try if applying patches 12 and 14 from my series causes problems for you? (it may be easier to apply the entire set or pull from [1] to avoid rebase conflicts). Arnd [1] kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/playground.git mach-cleanup-5.4 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel