From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/debug: add a cast to u64 for atomic64_read() Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:00:50 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1PpgjRKFemEi7mLuECh1srs8bbzoc07RSrFsx+febjaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190311122100.GF22862@mellanox.com> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 1:21 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 08:58:15PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Mar 2019, Qian Cai wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> > > Not saying this patch shouldn't go ahead.. > > But is there a special reason the atomic64*'s on ppc don't use the u64 > type like other archs? Seems like a better thing to fix than adding > casts all over the place. Agreed in principle, but I'd note that it's not just ppc64, but almost all 64-bit architectures. x86-64 and arm64 changed over last year from returning 'long' to 'long long', apparently as an unintended side effect of commits 8bf705d13039 ("locking/atomic/x86: Switch atomic.h to use atomic-instrumented.h") and c0df10812835 ("arm64, locking/atomics: Use instrumented atomics"). It would be nice to just do the instrumented atomics on all 64-bit architectures for consistency, but that would be a lot of work, and would not actually give us additional instrumentation on most of them, since they don't support KASAN (except s390). Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 14:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-03-10 18:30 Qian Cai 2019-03-11 3:58 ` Davidlohr Bueso 2019-03-11 12:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2019-03-11 14:00 ` Qian Cai 2019-03-11 14:00 ` Qian Cai 2019-03-11 14:20 ` Arnd Bergmann 2019-03-11 14:20 ` Arnd Bergmann 2019-03-13 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra 2019-03-13 13:46 ` Arnd Bergmann 2019-03-13 13:46 ` Arnd Bergmann 2019-03-13 14:21 ` Peter Zijlstra 2019-03-13 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra 2019-03-13 14:35 ` Mark Rutland 2019-03-13 14:57 ` Arnd Bergmann 2019-03-13 14:57 ` Arnd Bergmann 2019-03-13 16:29 ` Mark Rutland 2019-03-11 14:00 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message] 2019-03-11 14:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAK8P3a1PpgjRKFemEi7mLuECh1srs8bbzoc07RSrFsx+febjaQ@mail.gmail.com \ --to=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=cai@lca.pw \ --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] mm/debug: add a cast to u64 for atomic64_read()' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.