From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751906AbdFPU44 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:56:56 -0400 Received: from mail-ot0-f195.google.com ([74.125.82.195]:34955 "EHLO mail-ot0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750981AbdFPU4y (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:56:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170614211556.2062728-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20170614211556.2062728-4-arnd@arndb.de> <20170615045221.GA26687@kroah.com> <20170615045347.GA26913@kroah.com> <20170616130215.GC31057@kroah.com> <20170616155859.gn2einuermlncaku@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 22:56:53 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QUVGNIsGEwXCmK2zz1HwIPAueDs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] tty: kbd: reduce stack size with KASAN To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Samuel Thibault , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , kasan-dev , Dmitry Vyukov , Alexander Potapenko , Andrey Ryabinin , Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arend van Spriel , Jiri Slaby Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Samuel Thibault > wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann, on ven. 16 juin 2017 17:41:47 +0200, wrote: >>> The problem are the 'ch' and 'flag' variables that are passed into >>> tty_insert_flip_char by value, and from there into >>> tty_insert_flip_string_flags by reference. In this case, kasan tries >>> to detect whether tty_insert_flip_string_flags() does any out-of-bounds >>> access on the pointers and adds 64 bytes redzone around each of >>> the two variables. >> >> Ouch. >> >>> gcc-6.3.1 happens to inline 16 calls of tty_insert_flip_char() into > > I wonder if we should stop marking tty_insert_flip_char() as inline. That would be an easy solution, yes. tty_insert_flip_char() was apparently meant to be optimized for the fast path to completely avoid calling into another function, but that fast path got a bit more complex with commit acc0f67f307f ("tty: Halve flip buffer GFP_ATOMIC memory consumption"). If we move it out of line, the fast path optimization goes away and we could just have a simple implementation like int tty_insert_flip_char(struct tty_port *port, unsigned char ch, char flag) { struct tty_buffer *tb = port->buf.tail; int flags = (flag == TTY_NORMAL) ? TTYB_NORMAL : 0; if (!__tty_buffer_request_room(port, 1, flags)) return 0; if (~tb->flags & TTYB_NORMAL) *flag_buf_ptr(tb, tb->used) = flag; *char_buf_ptr(tb, tb->used++) = ch; return 1; } One rather simple change I found would actually avoid the warning and would seem to actually give us better runtime behavior even without KASAN: diff --git a/include/linux/tty_flip.h b/include/linux/tty_flip.h index c28dd523f96e..15d03a14ad0f 100644 --- a/include/linux/tty_flip.h +++ b/include/linux/tty_flip.h @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static inline int tty_insert_flip_char(struct tty_port *port, *char_buf_ptr(tb, tb->used++) = ch; return 1; } - return tty_insert_flip_string_flags(port, &ch, &flag, 1); + return tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag(port, &ch, flag, 1); } static inline int tty_insert_flip_string(struct tty_port *port, This reduces the stack frame size for kbd_event() to 1256 bytes, which is well within the limit, and it lets us keep the flag-less buffers across a 'tb->used >= tb->size' condition. Calling into tty_insert_flip_string_flags() today will allocate a flag buffer if there isn't already one, even when it is not needed. >> I'm however afraid we'd have to mark a lot of static functions that way, >> depending on the aggressivity of gcc... I'd indeed really argue that gcc >> should consider stack usage when inlining. >> >> static int f(int foo) { >> char c[256]; >> g(c, foo); >> } >> >> is really not something that I'd want to see the compiler to inline. > > Why would not we want it be inlined? What we do not want us several > calls having _separate_ instances of 'c' generated on the stack, all > inlined calls should share 'c'. And of course if we have f1, f2, and > f3 with c1, c2, and c3, GCC should not blow up the stack inlining and > allocating stack for all 3 of them beforehand. > > But this all seems to me issue that should be solved in toolchain, not > trying to play whack-a-mole with kernel sources. The problem for the Samuel's example is that a) the "--param asan-stack=1" option in KASAN does blow up the stack, which is why the annotation is now called 'noinline_if_stackbloat'. b) The toolchain cannot solve the problem, as most instances of the problem (unlike kbd_put_queue) force the inlining unless you build with the x86-specific CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING. Arnd