From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-qt0-f195.google.com ([209.85.216.195]:35662 "EHLO mail-qt0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932081AbeDFOhQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:37:16 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f195.google.com with SMTP id s2so1352870qti.2 for ; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:37:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180406112640.1441ca9f@vento.lan> References: <24a526280e4eb319147908ccab786e2ebc8f8076.1522949748.git.mchehab@s-opensource.com> <20180406064718.2cdb69ea@vento.lan> <20180406111537.04375bdf@vento.lan> <20180406112640.1441ca9f@vento.lan> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:37:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] media: fsl-viu: allow building it with COMPILE_TEST To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Linux Media Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Hans Verkuil , Stanimir Varbanov , Benjamin Gaignard , Ramesh Shanmugasundaram , Al Viro , Bhumika Goyal , Arvind Yadav , Kees Cook , Geliang Tang Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:16:46 +0200 > Arnd Bergmann escreveu: > >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab >> wrote: >> > Em Fri, 6 Apr 2018 11:51:16 +0200 >> > Arnd Bergmann escreveu: >> > >> >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > [PATCH] media: fsl-viu: allow building it with COMPILE_TEST >> >> > >> >> > There aren't many things that would be needed to allow it >> >> > to build with compile test. >> >> > >> >> > Add the needed bits. >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab >> >> >> >> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann >> > >> > Actually, in order to avoid warnings with smatch, the COMPILE_TEST >> > macros should be declared as: >> > >> > +#define out_be32(v, a) iowrite32be(a, (void __iomem *)v) >> > +#define in_be32(a) ioread32be((void __iomem *)a) >> >> I would just add the correct annotations, I think they've always been missing. >> 2 patches coming in a few minutes. > > I corrected the annotations too. Now, it gives the same results > building for both arm and x86. > > If you want to double check, the full tree is at: > > https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/log/?h=compile_test The __iomem annotations look good, my other patch is still needed to get a clean build with "make C=1" but doesn't apply cleanly on top of your version. I assume you'll just fix it up accordingly. Arnd