From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Helmut Grohne <helmutg@debian.org>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>,
Zong Li <zongbox@gmail.com>,
debian-arm@lists.debian.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@wdc.com>,
Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>,
arcml <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: switching ARC to 64-bit time_t (Re: [RFC v6 07/23] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64)
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 09:42:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2n6fRm4C5Ywyk5ys92jSOAc5SwvBVZyFOY9=4rB2pyjw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220103716.2f526933@jawa>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:37 AM Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de> wrote:
> [2] - https://github.com/lmajewski/y2038_glibc/commits/y2038_edge
I tried packaging this into a .deb package for use with rebootstrap, but
ran into a couple of test failures from glibc itself, when testing the i386
version while running on an older x86_64 kernel (4.15):
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Encountered regressions that don't match expected failures. |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
FAIL: elf/check-localplt
FAIL: nptl/tst-cancel19
FAIL: rt/tst-mqueue2
make: *** [debian/rules.d/build.mk:116:
/home/arnd/glibc-2.31/stamp-dir/check_i386] Error 1
elf/check-localplt complains about the newly added symbols
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __lutimes64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __wait4_time64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __setitimer64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __utime64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __timerfd_gettime64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __clock_settime64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __utimes64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __gettimeofday64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __clock_gettime64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __futimesat64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __clock_getres64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __futimes64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __futimens64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __utimensat64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __getrusage64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __timespec_get64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __getitimer64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __ppoll64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __timerfd_settime64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __clock_nanosleep_time64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __sched_rr_get_interval64
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: __settimeofday64
Extra PLT reference: librt.so: __timer_gettime64
Extra PLT reference: librt.so: __mq_timedreceive_time64
Extra PLT reference: librt.so: __mq_timedsend_time64
Extra PLT reference: librt.so: __timer_settime64
which seems a bug in the test suite. The other two get a segfault
that I have not debugged, but I guess this is likely a problem in your
patches. Have you seen the same thing?
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-22 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1578824547.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com>
[not found] ` <4e95f95966d8d7c6a8339160dc62d81c1f6a1bfb.1578824547.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com>
2020-02-12 0:14 ` [RFC v6 07/23] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64 Vineet Gupta
2020-02-12 0:14 ` Alistair Francis
2020-02-12 1:30 ` Joseph Myers
2020-02-14 22:39 ` Alistair Francis
2020-02-18 23:05 ` switching ARC to 64-bit time_t (Re: [RFC v6 07/23] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64) Vineet Gupta
2020-02-18 23:13 ` Joseph Myers
2020-02-19 23:09 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-19 23:11 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-20 8:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-20 9:37 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-20 12:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-20 13:14 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-20 14:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-20 15:42 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-20 16:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-20 16:31 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-24 2:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-02-21 19:56 ` Alistair Francis
2020-02-22 8:42 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2020-02-24 9:00 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-24 9:46 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-02-24 10:14 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-24 10:23 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-02-24 10:36 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-24 10:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-02-24 11:13 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-24 12:41 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-25 0:03 ` Joseph Myers
2020-02-25 11:39 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-25 14:36 ` Joseph Myers
2020-02-26 13:18 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-26 14:48 ` Joseph Myers
2020-02-26 16:28 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-25 9:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-20 16:27 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-03-26 0:25 ` ARC rebootstrap prereq (was Re: switching ARC to 64-bit time_t ) Vineet Gupta
2020-03-26 5:54 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-03-26 11:51 ` Alexey Brodkin
2020-03-26 12:24 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-03-26 12:53 ` Alexey Brodkin
2020-03-26 14:28 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-03-26 19:04 ` Lennart Sorensen
2020-08-26 14:39 ` Vineet Gupta
2020-08-26 15:43 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-08-26 21:16 ` Aurelien Jarno
2021-02-24 20:17 ` Vineet Gupta
2021-02-26 9:47 ` Helmut Grohne
2021-02-26 15:58 ` Vineet Gupta
2021-08-21 17:36 ` Aurelien Jarno
2020-02-12 1:42 ` [RFC v6 07/23] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64 Vineet Gupta
2020-02-12 12:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-19 0:56 ` Vineet Gupta
2020-02-19 1:03 ` Alistair Francis
2020-02-19 1:31 ` Vineet Gupta
2020-02-19 8:30 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-02-19 18:42 ` Vineet Gupta
2020-02-19 23:18 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-20 0:26 ` Vineet Gupta
2020-02-20 0:46 ` Joseph Myers
2020-02-20 8:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-20 10:28 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-02-20 14:14 ` Joseph Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK8P3a2n6fRm4C5Ywyk5ys92jSOAc5SwvBVZyFOY9=4rB2pyjw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=alistair23@gmail.com \
--cc=debian-arm@lists.debian.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=helmutg@debian.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=macro@wdc.com \
--cc=palmerdabbelt@google.com \
--cc=zongbox@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.