From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:36286 "EHLO mail-oi0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754313AbdC1H3r (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 03:29:47 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id r203so35442220oib.3 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:29:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170327122146.GB25373@1wt.eu> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:29:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: v3.10.105 build: 1 failures 174 warnings (v3.10.105) To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Build bot for Mark Brown , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:27:41PM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: > >>> /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/include/linux/module.h:87:32: error: storage size of '__mod_amba_device_table' isn't known >>> /home/broonie/build/linux-stable/include/linux/module.h:87:32: error: storage size of '__mod_amba_device_table' isn't known >> >> Interesting, nothing seems to have changed regrading this between >> 3.10.104 and 3.10.105 so it's possible the issue is in fact older. >> I do have an arm64 toolchain here, I'll try to figure what the problem >> is. > > I see the new build results now with a clean build. Nevermind, that was 4.10, not 3.10. Arnd