From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F928C56202 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEDB217A0 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IKQs2iNY" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727876AbgKQQlC (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:41:02 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33770 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725808AbgKQQlC (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:41:02 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com (mail-wm1-f44.google.com [209.85.128.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E60A217A0 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:41:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1605631261; bh=7pdIVoc+TZaIlxSArpWjtHOuX7KNxgJ7y+hDv82ymJU=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=IKQs2iNYHgKmfbD6Qxh+cE/IuHjFSVQ5BUk8ZmaHhmNorjLZjVGR+yGgImSVUVZMG 15pP+91xp7AdBtE2u0/u8VlQwD7HSGFnEgqGFPO+vcOgsoHYVx/1xwbrOdqQxS7+HM +9i2S66TTTLVDObMENJu4IqCunoTb9kJLh+78EzI= Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id c9so3872340wml.5 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:41:01 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532S8RgD+iPkkCYjBptyIWFLjAm+UYTK97Pbyrhe/UWFDrO3lNp2 KD07QBo4lPmTMm6fPBdbk0FXL05v7wI2wWxsGW4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzgg8JK2zm2f/hcnHO/zBPrcQ6Nlb7zX5Kzp599tXVS+r9H99PunDPSqye6KQydntansJbfRHx1+iSKYhZ9QI= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:208f:: with SMTP id g137mr536457wmg.116.1605631260076; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:41:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201110161338.18198-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> <20201113101940.GH3718728@dell> <20201117123741.GH1869941@dell> <20201117160501.GJ1869941@dell> In-Reply-To: <20201117160501.GJ1869941@dell> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:40:43 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: syscon: Add syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional() function. To: Lee Jones Cc: Matthias Brugger , Enric Balletbo i Serra , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Collabora Kernel ML , Nicolas Boichat , Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:07 PM Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 17/11/2020 13:37, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > If you want to go the route for me rebasing my tree on top of for-mfd-next > > then I'd like to have at least a stable tag, so that it will be easier to > > provide the pull-request later on. Would that be a compromise? > > I don't usually provide immutable branches/tags unless I'm sharing > topic branches for other maintainers to pick-up, in order to avoid > merge conflicts. I think that's what Matthias is planning to do though. If he wants to send me a Mediatek specific branch for the soc tree, it needs to be based on a stable commit in the mtd tree to avoid duplicating the commit. Arnd