From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCE0C4320A for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7408604D7 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234653AbhG2LoD (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:44:03 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.73]:42157 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232149AbhG2LoC (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:44:02 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue106 [213.165.67.113]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MfI21-1moS0b0Bxb-00gsOo; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:43:58 +0200 Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id d131-20020a1c1d890000b02902516717f562so3824085wmd.3; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 04:43:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532warOa1r2ZI+rvjck7n4+3nSMJXaK2FyRIr+n/AV94aWMWgMqp N09coDnNGrrFXdKdYXvQFuv6r8yqFvWrYpwcUbg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbppc/JPPZnVXIJRhSL3wkyGUoLrN10oQdMb92u/LFvTxbI6h5V4i9grXrLQRAisKA2AJVJvfij5OI1JtTHOU= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c2fa:: with SMTP id e26mr14185233wmk.84.1627559037719; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 04:43:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210729093003.146166-1-wangrui@loongson.cn> <20210729095551.GE21151@willie-the-truck> In-Reply-To: <20210729095551.GE21151@willie-the-truck> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:43:41 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] locking/atomic: Implement atomic{,64,_long}_{fetch_,}{andnot_or}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}() To: Will Deacon Cc: Rui Wang , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnd Bergmann , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Guo Ren , linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rui Wang , Xuefeng Li , Huacai Chen , Jiaxun Yang , Huacai Chen , kernel test robot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:PSd/ZKkm0Owrv69gRb7RozUkEsniD7dBmfYhgnfNlHML70dbmK5 4dpC8socb6Mo7NahTBtqxjFxWJdrx5s4AbspJvB0gNVtNt0l3IW4DCj7+Hmf0CKODoinQAd IX6EZgUi1DdWJlXqlzpOBvqzBB2NgOqNxkZPoqREgcI3vtkWz4aGwTqqi0dleE9AqoAdQqY lBXPghoiiU2tyis5cENQA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:ycsMeSeDWD0=:MF/GyuibULUA0ncJVim/S7 Rzz3cAKMNB5D+IjQOG2OV2QwtWqSyfRVoTozxbUVPxhC15VIX1qwLKR5m6c5qCCgrRD5DD9Ok ij24tjsqiCbIptNK+fUWAAgxzgarWAEQxdDLHDUJ2+2efHmgN0RrE+JT/1w/S7BpHD9sLJihW L9bkXqumCmhmM9lz/FYTNeUsgXJr6R1ojMe3D4ZkwtI1kvrxGvfXzzPzdsEluDOCubVFyObbB bLNWsb60cNjT+FBaKl/UAu7CjTxQu/JsTNwO66sGTRjnk9aRY2EmUit0BuiWbL+nqTCQzoG0V H5UYWGdWcQkH8KLABPxV32IQ3J3/FKeZ4eTFSFLxzJ2z/qLMJzVwYEcdI5NZvVeqGesYHip5/ zZW/3uRL/p8L7RBQIbKWlnx+kDFO6aG4MLiVJ+k9EN4GY4kU2nhQP4t3ThCv3KKcxx/xn0cdo UGqx1E4Z4IY3/71unYEmWJbuwtu5osnin84GkffE262tQPEixoKjpu0Jqsf0n6WRq4ZJMJnQo Q2skttKr7luh1558MwZ0qLCPSsPvYU7hyGHPmcVURKhfkNafnr5RV7+ieNxC1Db197YSYswW/ lIsxn6mE3NX40PB1A8vwGEL35XgvkTOmr+YGx57c6qFXI6cTGNdhcahyGsx1cE/64bWRJCo+m 17AZMCFx0BVRyKgHPuQdrpL6UjmRY2i381T9GdRMyocFhHxYwd5K5Yxsp8XDIzUa3SNcG7dKa gqYGWToqSgWfomDQ+ayfimSn56zpRaD26SygUeoTq55JK7CTDTGON4bLnh1fRR8GLgCKMwna5 Hz+gOtkMKwF3AvsIpBFMVmGjBK4IEsHrLR7NUjGj1tw1BTHemp22DIoeVo36mWuszb0zTJCLm IgsVU8aCxSrWkbBInkEMMfTuLw9x4ooPhoxdT6NrykNlbOB4DSNQBBPKpO756myD/gsIppJyl CXQJZ7pbPXSY+HgE2cXxXoI1JkD5ZPkhKjF2Mt62M+2KGfWfoxaLo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:56 AM Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 05:30:03PM +0800, Rui Wang wrote: > > This patch introduce a new atomic primitive andnot_or: > > Please see my other comments on the other patches you posted: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210729093923.GD21151@willie-the-truck > > Overall, I'm not thrilled to bits by extending the atomics API with > operations that cannot be implemented efficiently on any (?) architectures > and are only used by the qspinlock slowpath on machines with more than 16K > CPUs. Wouldn't this also help improve set_mask_bits()? That one at least has a handful of users in the kernel. Arnd