From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38875C4727E for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2982084C for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="Iz7k38YF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729674AbgI3Shh (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:37:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43246 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725355AbgI3Shh (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:37:37 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CE4DC061755 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id c2so2818384otp.7 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:37:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GZokKNgMejCKfo0F2vRKE9nImzYNSzp/HUH90Pr6PJU=; b=Iz7k38YFYItPAO2RtiflnlRb5+BDWfPx9FQCvvU2f8SdCl7V1y7fJW6E60irWiBOlQ fH9GEK1n0pwT4bpaxG/cqFn7l9Zse+u3/d1Pt4ggVZd6tM3YSzezV3iBWBtU9IY/SgXQ GGeYqXdFFnSWXcgBytqYXCxu9xUWTpvQgSvlA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GZokKNgMejCKfo0F2vRKE9nImzYNSzp/HUH90Pr6PJU=; b=tumvHBZkOHUJlNLqXw1M3fbX68XIrplPuckkfkaljBDg6hb+/zozynArPUshP+ubrV Gl/R7Mo5PuGm0/gai+RkrLuePec6fQzG+JFeBMP3HdPaNoejKGL47OAlYGImrfZKN1bE TCw1KlI3XT50UVx+8/FK3EhtPNQonitjyVk0n6vcQO66VI8DCMF48BrrEGFrSDux96/t NxgdV7HwFTShEPi7+RFjGX5me6aYLNldfGWYdHT7/0l5pcAQeLLO9FvQBNdPTgff17nR 1vlHsoVtMrgRiPSmgB4t8ZLMr0NxB/2OXHOP3KMurSA93oCyvzjq019kYj1kqLGcjAHe seOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318p0VUCG9a4Mt54NucX1ksLETQgkk7nCSS6eBU9n5qkjCDuy4o u+wApJirYIsiCbvAnbDoFmKZQMhOIVbtYYKNvoGDeg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmG8KuipdmIEStVjCt4k/yD8YpcM6mVrZ29T55c3684BNdLJdgOsz6wDtmq5u1TIJFW1qJF02gBOu8zFVEiX4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:14d9:: with SMTP id t25mr2508122otq.188.1601491055725; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:37:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200924135853.875294-1-hch@lst.de> <20200925194349.d0ee9dbedb2ec48f0bfcd2ec@linux-foundation.org> <20200926062959.GA3427@lst.de> <160128801808.6464.1013594053120198786@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20200928123741.GA4999@lst.de> <160138340987.15771.13645983702040612672@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20200930144839.GA897@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20200930144839.GA897@lst.de> From: Daniel Vetter Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:37:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: remove alloc_vm_area v2 To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Joonas Lahtinen , Andrew Morton , David Airlie , Stephen Rothwell , Peter Zijlstra , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Jani Nikula , Tvrtko Ursulin , Chris Wilson , Matthew Auld , Rodrigo Vivi , Minchan Kim , Matthew Wilcox , Nitin Gupta , X86 ML , "moderated list:DRM DRIVERS FOR XEN" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , intel-gfx , dri-devel , Linux MM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:48 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:43:30PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hmm, those are both committed after our last -next pull request, so they > > would normally only target next merge window. drm-next closes the merge > > window around -rc5 already. > > > > But, in this specific case those are both Fixes: patches with Cc: stable, > > so they should be pulled into drm-intel-next-fixes PR. > > > > Rodrigo, can you cherry-pick those patches to -next-fixes that you send > > to Dave? > > They still haven't made it to linux-next. I think for now I'll just > rebase without them again and then you can handle the conflicts for > 5.11. Yeah after -rc6 drm is frozen for features, so anything that's stuck in subordinate trees rolls over to the next merge cycle. To avoid upsetting sfr from linux-next we keep those -next branches out of linux-next until after -rc1 again. iow, rebasing onto linux-next and smashing this into 5.10 sounds like the right approach (since everyone else freezes a bunch later afaik). Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E1BC47427 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C61E207F7 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="Iz7k38YF" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1C61E207F7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ffwll.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1024B6B005C; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:37:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 08C686B0062; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:37:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E95A16B0068; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:37:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0122.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.122]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBD56B005C for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:37:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778D140D7 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:39 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77320586238.09.ray90_0c184a927195 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0FE18179036 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:38 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: ray90_0c184a927195 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4696 Received: from mail-ot1-f53.google.com (mail-ot1-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) by imf44.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f53.google.com with SMTP id n61so2802280ota.10 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:37:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GZokKNgMejCKfo0F2vRKE9nImzYNSzp/HUH90Pr6PJU=; b=Iz7k38YFYItPAO2RtiflnlRb5+BDWfPx9FQCvvU2f8SdCl7V1y7fJW6E60irWiBOlQ fH9GEK1n0pwT4bpaxG/cqFn7l9Zse+u3/d1Pt4ggVZd6tM3YSzezV3iBWBtU9IY/SgXQ GGeYqXdFFnSWXcgBytqYXCxu9xUWTpvQgSvlA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GZokKNgMejCKfo0F2vRKE9nImzYNSzp/HUH90Pr6PJU=; b=owxd+lTQd6paBGtss22+IX3CxvugiSDThk16vkN4nf5S59S3DutlyfuA+WMYWkQFQa ylh5T7fitAMxW7pm/VAxZCo8yJOaATrGYxxONmqVhxKErFjjZgNZ93FnMcl0EGSeKmQO dc1NqfAcKM8IcXkpK6eA9o/Ox8+TSCgCq/SA+DcGqWGuWMIBWQmqpHf4TYCNf6A8YDVm chCY1OUBHbj4KUNHn41bzpACm7V4adUsLxlY68rcKX4ZmLjsPb23oph5gbD8S7BbxuUn 61lD7I03ZjAeedvF+yH715gRdp36yFmdG7R5Eta3jYmzFbip+cL0ZPNUa2zdjTRo2AiX dpBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KGwsbf3QiTSmdnUTEM6699prIJbZ5/Sqe1H6vnabhwXSTJda/ EfGy9sGTEsn4ZVmRy6IF/OTgQx4wSwtlizes6mqlWQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmG8KuipdmIEStVjCt4k/yD8YpcM6mVrZ29T55c3684BNdLJdgOsz6wDtmq5u1TIJFW1qJF02gBOu8zFVEiX4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:14d9:: with SMTP id t25mr2508122otq.188.1601491055725; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:37:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200924135853.875294-1-hch@lst.de> <20200925194349.d0ee9dbedb2ec48f0bfcd2ec@linux-foundation.org> <20200926062959.GA3427@lst.de> <160128801808.6464.1013594053120198786@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20200928123741.GA4999@lst.de> <160138340987.15771.13645983702040612672@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20200930144839.GA897@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20200930144839.GA897@lst.de> From: Daniel Vetter Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:37:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: remove alloc_vm_area v2 To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Joonas Lahtinen , Andrew Morton , David Airlie , Stephen Rothwell , Peter Zijlstra , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Jani Nikula , Tvrtko Ursulin , Chris Wilson , Matthew Auld , Rodrigo Vivi , Minchan Kim , Matthew Wilcox , Nitin Gupta , X86 ML , "moderated list:DRM DRIVERS FOR XEN" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , intel-gfx , dri-devel , Linux MM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:48 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:43:30PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hmm, those are both committed after our last -next pull request, so they > > would normally only target next merge window. drm-next closes the merge > > window around -rc5 already. > > > > But, in this specific case those are both Fixes: patches with Cc: stable, > > so they should be pulled into drm-intel-next-fixes PR. > > > > Rodrigo, can you cherry-pick those patches to -next-fixes that you send > > to Dave? > > They still haven't made it to linux-next. I think for now I'll just > rebase without them again and then you can handle the conflicts for > 5.11. Yeah after -rc6 drm is frozen for features, so anything that's stuck in subordinate trees rolls over to the next merge cycle. To avoid upsetting sfr from linux-next we keep those -next branches out of linux-next until after -rc1 again. iow, rebasing onto linux-next and smashing this into 5.10 sounds like the right approach (since everyone else freezes a bunch later afaik). Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4258C47426 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFBA420791 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="Iz7k38YF" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CFBA420791 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ffwll.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230266E7E6; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7919E6E372 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id m12so2854392otr.0 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:37:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GZokKNgMejCKfo0F2vRKE9nImzYNSzp/HUH90Pr6PJU=; b=Iz7k38YFYItPAO2RtiflnlRb5+BDWfPx9FQCvvU2f8SdCl7V1y7fJW6E60irWiBOlQ fH9GEK1n0pwT4bpaxG/cqFn7l9Zse+u3/d1Pt4ggVZd6tM3YSzezV3iBWBtU9IY/SgXQ GGeYqXdFFnSWXcgBytqYXCxu9xUWTpvQgSvlA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GZokKNgMejCKfo0F2vRKE9nImzYNSzp/HUH90Pr6PJU=; b=N3jw2ZgkQ/dltKxn9Yy34L7DueSnOiO3TVNAngRutUyU7iGcdQZoZ5AlZCv8XapClc 3WDQO3XpvPy8PQlvkVp1yhMMDTlwVB7PQAnBZCn76zySFhM74YEgm5eGVwL7h5bhfHhq JpQuxBFpAau1dB/DFbA3RpDaIEg6v8nIoCFAliSnYDJg2A/sf8llWGz/XDABYFXh3JzL pJT/iMrzg4DQGgCQ7lDi2+YiMbiR6Qow7Djse+qEUfa2z51woTHyNAKgWZdlGpWbvUsX jQdg8xZcZV9UeMtDnXGStYOMVrEYbLrm741euaAVI8vI6i71JSPlK2cKXUMt2G1GMquH z/Kg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wmngHNCXnl4iqCAwId8JwucBTzb2cXm+QMJU2tvKYSCBZpaPg kiRl0gsm2NckGliVBmiXINE+i26SVUXDyWIeNCiO0w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmG8KuipdmIEStVjCt4k/yD8YpcM6mVrZ29T55c3684BNdLJdgOsz6wDtmq5u1TIJFW1qJF02gBOu8zFVEiX4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:14d9:: with SMTP id t25mr2508122otq.188.1601491055725; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:37:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200924135853.875294-1-hch@lst.de> <20200925194349.d0ee9dbedb2ec48f0bfcd2ec@linux-foundation.org> <20200926062959.GA3427@lst.de> <160128801808.6464.1013594053120198786@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20200928123741.GA4999@lst.de> <160138340987.15771.13645983702040612672@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20200930144839.GA897@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20200930144839.GA897@lst.de> From: Daniel Vetter Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:37:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: remove alloc_vm_area v2 To: Christoph Hellwig X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: David Airlie , dri-devel , Chris Wilson , Linux MM , Stephen Rothwell , Stefano Stabellini , X86 ML , Matthew Wilcox , Peter Zijlstra , Matthew Auld , "moderated list:DRM DRIVERS FOR XEN" , Nitin Gupta , intel-gfx , Rodrigo Vivi , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Tvrtko Ursulin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:48 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:43:30PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hmm, those are both committed after our last -next pull request, so they > > would normally only target next merge window. drm-next closes the merge > > window around -rc5 already. > > > > But, in this specific case those are both Fixes: patches with Cc: stable, > > so they should be pulled into drm-intel-next-fixes PR. > > > > Rodrigo, can you cherry-pick those patches to -next-fixes that you send > > to Dave? > > They still haven't made it to linux-next. I think for now I'll just > rebase without them again and then you can handle the conflicts for > 5.11. Yeah after -rc6 drm is frozen for features, so anything that's stuck in subordinate trees rolls over to the next merge cycle. To avoid upsetting sfr from linux-next we keep those -next branches out of linux-next until after -rc1 again. iow, rebasing onto linux-next and smashing this into 5.10 sounds like the right approach (since everyone else freezes a bunch later afaik). Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D0CC47420 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FC9120888 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="Iz7k38YF" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7FC9120888 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ffwll.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF8A6E372; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7946D6E5BF for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id u25so2820713otq.6 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:37:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GZokKNgMejCKfo0F2vRKE9nImzYNSzp/HUH90Pr6PJU=; b=Iz7k38YFYItPAO2RtiflnlRb5+BDWfPx9FQCvvU2f8SdCl7V1y7fJW6E60irWiBOlQ fH9GEK1n0pwT4bpaxG/cqFn7l9Zse+u3/d1Pt4ggVZd6tM3YSzezV3iBWBtU9IY/SgXQ GGeYqXdFFnSWXcgBytqYXCxu9xUWTpvQgSvlA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GZokKNgMejCKfo0F2vRKE9nImzYNSzp/HUH90Pr6PJU=; b=CxCYEsb8NAr/i76eu5mX18nH3Qr997JUkR+7KQfo9AXKnA7CMqE4mLeKOzmW4SIHdk 0SvRb+2dhK2xk6P/CCOhM4Ys2oRGdbntbtNWrMXYeqWdr80MCIX6qMpGKXci6fZLiobw 3PgW3TIxuHo9G6Bih3XEUo+WpDf+0xpc/rIwSd5MOeYKqj8x4nJt6c6aOrdk2wx1bjuC 89ctdpv8r4eIGttnVTVNA9R88GT3oMfLhvOdF1G/Q9yTUiDBhT++eGGVdni3qqzzdtfN WdBaUi3l4Z2C+PC8YoqfWFSHe3jvkNjPzyUX1SXGXBnEkMnVkaKL+n4wgtO6iyjuML1s fO0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531num7xl5VLdQSbcD49LtQhoEHZxxqF8G0bxX0i+yTFpf9JrGij lG6SqYcgWUjrXrd8ZhFJ5X9tdXU7d9Yco4xxRbYjyw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmG8KuipdmIEStVjCt4k/yD8YpcM6mVrZ29T55c3684BNdLJdgOsz6wDtmq5u1TIJFW1qJF02gBOu8zFVEiX4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:14d9:: with SMTP id t25mr2508122otq.188.1601491055725; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:37:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200924135853.875294-1-hch@lst.de> <20200925194349.d0ee9dbedb2ec48f0bfcd2ec@linux-foundation.org> <20200926062959.GA3427@lst.de> <160128801808.6464.1013594053120198786@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20200928123741.GA4999@lst.de> <160138340987.15771.13645983702040612672@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20200930144839.GA897@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20200930144839.GA897@lst.de> From: Daniel Vetter Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:37:24 +0200 Message-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] remove alloc_vm_area v2 X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: David Airlie , dri-devel , Chris Wilson , Linux MM , Stephen Rothwell , Stefano Stabellini , X86 ML , Matthew Wilcox , Peter Zijlstra , Matthew Auld , "moderated list:DRM DRIVERS FOR XEN" , Nitin Gupta , intel-gfx , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:48 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:43:30PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hmm, those are both committed after our last -next pull request, so they > > would normally only target next merge window. drm-next closes the merge > > window around -rc5 already. > > > > But, in this specific case those are both Fixes: patches with Cc: stable, > > so they should be pulled into drm-intel-next-fixes PR. > > > > Rodrigo, can you cherry-pick those patches to -next-fixes that you send > > to Dave? > > They still haven't made it to linux-next. I think for now I'll just > rebase without them again and then you can handle the conflicts for > 5.11. Yeah after -rc6 drm is frozen for features, so anything that's stuck in subordinate trees rolls over to the next merge cycle. To avoid upsetting sfr from linux-next we keep those -next branches out of linux-next until after -rc1 again. iow, rebasing onto linux-next and smashing this into 5.10 sounds like the right approach (since everyone else freezes a bunch later afaik). Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx