From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] drm/gem: create drm_gem_dumb_destroy
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:03:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uEmEKFvLUgk2GL73vyWueos_TF35UJ9Yg2WP9VKLkY9Yw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1376517769-7171-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<1376517769-7171-12-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<20130815072447.GC21854@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130815072447.GC21854@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@gmail.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> All the gem based kms drivers really want the same function to
>> destroy a dumb framebuffer backing storage object.
>>
>> So give it to them and roll it out in all drivers.
>>
>> This still leaves the option open for kms drivers which don't use GEM
>> for backing storage, but it does decently simplify matters for gem
>> drivers.
>
> You only add a header here, is there a chunk missing from the code or
> was it exported already and just not declared?

The patch is merged already, but somehow rebase thought that chunk is
missing. This patch can be savely ignored ;-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch