From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: set FORCE_ARB_IDLE_PLANES
	workaround
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 12:51:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uF4vG+h9WyHqhoQXDY3fh+mSv1WKomCz8AJj9fZoYsr4A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1367612625-4823-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
	<1367612625-4823-10-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
	<20130521100120.GK12292@phenom.ffwll.local>
	<CA+gsUGR+JsuEKDrEGJWNTDF9EgsKWxJPPzPQ--HGD4H-C-sMLg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130523103631.GC5004@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com
	[209.85.223.175])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B61DE5C26
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 23 May 2013 03:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id s9so8222169iec.34
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 23 May 2013 03:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130523103631.GC5004@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ville_Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Ville Syrj=E4l=E4
<ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > I've applied all the patches in this series safe for the target_clock =
one.
>> > But this patch here is missing the w/a tag, can you please supply that=
 one
>> > in a quick reply so that I can smash it into the patch?
>>
>> Just like most display workarounds, this one doesn't have a name.
>
> Actually I found a name for it in BSpec: WaRsPkgCStateDisplayPMReq

Comment added, thanks for digging this one out.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch