From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: fix up semaphore_waits_for Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:24:08 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1394838536-5372-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <87vbv7v4l4.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> <20140322175225.GG26519@phenom.ffwll.local> <20140324223711.GA2082@bwidawsk.net> <20140325094209.GN26878@phenom.ffwll.local> <20140325145408.GA777@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com [209.85.213.173]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7989A6E339 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 08:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ig0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t19so10934951igi.0 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 08:24:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140325145408.GA777@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Ben Widawsky Cc: Intel Graphics Development List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > I don't think it's quite that easy, but I took it as a, "yes." Which one > is patch 3? "drm/i915: make semaphore signaller detection more robust" - it was a follow-up patch in this thread, hence no 3/3. If the relevant bits on bdw have moved out of the the cmd dword I guess we need to keep a cache of the relevant dword and supply it to the function. Was too lazy to check that though. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch