From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4 Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 13:53:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4E5DD7FA.9000103@spth.de> <4E61F3D8.4080306@spth.de> <4E6206D6.2010709@spth.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-vx0-f177.google.com (mail-vx0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D719F065 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 04:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vxj2 with SMTP id 2so3425155vxj.36 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 04:53:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E6206D6.2010709@spth.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Philipp Klaus Krause Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:52, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: >>> This regression was introduced between 3.0 and 3.1rc1. >> >> If it's a kernel regression, can you please try to bisect it? >> > > I might have a look at it when I find the time to do so. That would be very useful. Your description sounds like damage isn't properly flushed somewhere in the X server. This being caused by a kernel changes is rather strange, so more information about the actual culprit is certainly useful. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch - +41 (0) 79 364 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch