From: Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@gmail.com>
To: David Niklas <Hgntkwis@vfemail.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] why do sensors break CPU scaling
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 14:44:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKR_QVKahv4jZcK7k+kCKUuMz0UQJ-FFmT6Uc_p+3dYPXJ=9OQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191120205119.41cd5989@Phenom-II-x6.niklas.com>
On 21/11/2019, David Niklas <Hgntkwis@vfemail.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:42:12 +0100
> Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Recently I've needed to set lowest CPU scaling profile, running ubuntu
>> 16.04.06 I used standard approach - echoing powersave to
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor.
>> This did not work as the
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq kept returning
>> max scaling freq.
>>
>> During testing of ubuntu 19.10 I've found that the above approach
>> actually does work, but as long as there are no xsensors (or just
>> sensors from cli) being run.
>> cpuinfo_cur_freq in this case was returning variable values +- 1% of
>> around 1.4GHz.
>> As soon as I issue sensors command cpuinfo_cur_freq jumps to 3.5GHz
>> for a fraction of second and returns back to 1.4GHz afterwards. If
>> running xsensors it keeps bouncing between 1.4 and 3.5GHz all the
>> time.
>>
>> Rebooted back to 16.04.6 and was able to set lowest CPU scaling freq
>> as well, but issuing sensors command here once just breaks CPU scaling
>> that now remains at about 3.5GHz.
>> It can be set to lowest scaling freq again without rebooting but it
>> needs to change scaling_governor for all cores to something else and
>> then back to powersave.
>>
>> Why is this happening, shouldn't sensors command just read temp/fan
>> values without writing to any of the CPU control registers?
>
> I don't know if the maintainers will notice your email, but I did. I
> don't guarantee that they'll notice or help you, but this should assist
> you in writing a proper question.
> You need to include the output of uname -a on both ubuntu boxes. The
> output of:
> dpkg -l xsensors
> dpkg -l lm-sensors
this is on 16.04.6
whtw46ww4@I5576:~$ uname -a
Linux I5576 4.15.0-51-generic #55~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 16
09:24:37 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
whtw46ww4@I5576:~$ dpkg -l xsensors
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
Architecture Description
+++-=============================================-===========================-===========================-===============================================================================================
ii xsensors 0.70-3
amd64 hardware health information viewer
whtw46ww4@I5576:~$ dpkg -l lm-sensors
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
Architecture Description
+++-=============================================-===========================-===========================-===============================================================================================
ii lm-sensors 1:3.4.0-2
amd64 utilities to read
temperature/voltage/fan sensors
>
> The information on which processor you own and the motherboard and
> it's BIOS version just in case.
>
> This is just my understanding and it might be wrong, but the CPU is
> probably accessed to do the request to the fan values and so it ramps up
> expecting to have to deal with a more intense workload (which is exactly
> what Ryzen and several newer Intel processors are supposed to do), and so
> you're seeing expected behavior.
I don't think that is the case here, since I can run any kind of more
demanding app than xsensors is, even compile software with -j 5
(multithread) and CPU clocks don't exceed 1.40GHz. Only on xsensors
launch CPU clocks are reset.
Regards, Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-23 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-20 20:42 [RFC] why do sensors break CPU scaling Tom Psyborg
2019-11-21 1:51 ` David Niklas
2019-11-23 13:44 ` Tom Psyborg [this message]
2020-01-31 22:35 ` Pavel Machek
2020-02-01 0:16 ` Tom Psyborg
2020-02-01 0:16 ` Tom Psyborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKR_QVKahv4jZcK7k+kCKUuMz0UQJ-FFmT6Uc_p+3dYPXJ=9OQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pozega.tomislav@gmail.com \
--cc=Hgntkwis@vfemail.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.