From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753167AbdLDElE (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2017 23:41:04 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:40349 "EHLO mail-lf0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753091AbdLDElD (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2017 23:41:03 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYYLxRN7shNGNZLzj2ZStDM5xxhdFQ8rsEvuGGjS+lo5FFFArCkDRkHixGnZ7GriP82u2R6IpmidFcSjdxa1SU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20171016183222.25750-1-ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com> <20171107012355.GC13514@arm.com> From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:11:01 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] Add support for ThunderX2 pmu events using json files To: John Garry , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Will Deacon , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, Alexander Shishkin , jnair@caviumnetworks.com, Zhangshaokun , Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, Robert Richter , Linuxarm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi perf maintainers, can this be queued to -next?? please let me know, if have to rebase to any specific branch and send next version? On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:34 PM, John Garry wrote: > On 07/11/2017 01:23, Will Deacon wrote: >> >> Hi Arnaldo, >> >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:02:17AM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >>> >>> Extending json/jevent framework for parsing arm64 event files. >>> Adding jevents for ThunderX2 implementation defined PMU events. >>> >>> v9: >>> - Rebased to [3] and resolved conficts in PATCH 1/5 and reworked PATCH >>> 3/5. >>> - Added PATCH 5 to fix segmentation fault in perf_pmu__find_map >>> >>> [3] >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=perf/core >> >> >> I'm happy with this version of the series (it's all Acked now), so would >> you >> be able to pick it up for mainline, please? >> >> Cheers, >> > > So this patchset has not been merged. > > We have a patchset waiting for HiSilicon hip08 support, which includes the > requested feature for the ARM64 IMP DEFINED recommended events > refactoring-out. > > We can send our hip08 patchset now as an RFC, based in this patchset. > Depending on the comments and general acceptance of the approaches, it may > be appropriate to merge the patchsets (or at least merge the refactoring > part). > > Thanks, > John > > >> Will >> >> . >> > > thanks Ganapat From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gklkml16@gmail.com (Ganapatrao Kulkarni) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:11:01 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v9 0/5] Add support for ThunderX2 pmu events using json files In-Reply-To: References: <20171016183222.25750-1-ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com> <20171107012355.GC13514@arm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi perf maintainers, can this be queued to -next?? please let me know, if have to rebase to any specific branch and send next version? On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:34 PM, John Garry wrote: > On 07/11/2017 01:23, Will Deacon wrote: >> >> Hi Arnaldo, >> >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:02:17AM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >>> >>> Extending json/jevent framework for parsing arm64 event files. >>> Adding jevents for ThunderX2 implementation defined PMU events. >>> >>> v9: >>> - Rebased to [3] and resolved conficts in PATCH 1/5 and reworked PATCH >>> 3/5. >>> - Added PATCH 5 to fix segmentation fault in perf_pmu__find_map >>> >>> [3] >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=perf/core >> >> >> I'm happy with this version of the series (it's all Acked now), so would >> you >> be able to pick it up for mainline, please? >> >> Cheers, >> > > So this patchset has not been merged. > > We have a patchset waiting for HiSilicon hip08 support, which includes the > requested feature for the ARM64 IMP DEFINED recommended events > refactoring-out. > > We can send our hip08 patchset now as an RFC, based in this patchset. > Depending on the comments and general acceptance of the approaches, it may > be appropriate to merge the patchsets (or at least merge the refactoring > part). > > Thanks, > John > > >> Will >> >> . >> > > thanks Ganapat