From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B90C54FD0 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D3820784 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="oRYryNCl" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726885AbgDWUko (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:40:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45660 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726377AbgDWUko (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:40:44 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb42.google.com (mail-yb1-xb42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D143C09B043 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb42.google.com with SMTP id l84so3864694ybb.1 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:40:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GiAggMTdEI+PSkFEvICFsKzD8PMWNxu1XhigoAo8ZFk=; b=oRYryNCltzBR3y9BL1s+jCUMyN9XWGhlvZ9oUn9+pG6V3VAcQ1F2Fa7hy6KTQMdPcW 6nmtEUOW3SO6xJcZgPo3iDPRoNjaAXcIqFXSxf5+vH+YPSmfhaz24EMF510kpbixaOmw TmUo9nKPZo7qkJyMKY7/Uq0L9Ik53muTIGFQTaHus8WKQvNVIjCNYfaLVDmAjyP1uAZ7 JkpAqlbEGHfKesLKISlS1Dt1BbzCK9mwNFaESPfnbPJun0mVkY7snd5DxCpRmB2Gl3NV TPhkssL2/QHq0TgXR2wkYTox51FI4TWsB+c87jNU0n9cRKn+rVujbTn3CMuFQT3FIisG 015w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GiAggMTdEI+PSkFEvICFsKzD8PMWNxu1XhigoAo8ZFk=; b=rcP7GVSz8J8nRT0kV9xJIJ+l6sWSGaCgOyN1E+7kmyrSX76QETQka3RzjISHXkGWgU eZIG+vyesRTPexrg/WHEC8HrLnL59PhewYsPEb1m89pjI8AuvTUfcDsiL0LUL4TfLGwR d1yN5liV5PXUyxlPCoLQS3HCNSiGHiubvr9Rn+ppR6/T1gdOjsjE27AKsY3/XsqMtMIm rxW2oeHI6My1UqRItVbBkILnVjAdxBM7P7YP4qqAdEcMBtuqazPN5asEJhmzX9uzS9tU jFBISBR4Yn4oARVlcdJar+UZdx5v8nDECQR7LLW0lCPNeKt7+dIKbD8uHcRRNGFXWKPL atlA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuagGeN68MEC/0yTAlBzQLs1ql+XvlzV086lLX37nZTUt/js4oQl 9TMnuK0CFYd5Z2BdYqabKMEhRSbQVc6JCHiCzPtZ1g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKe47D7DaKEuIi8C1WVF0Ns073XtAG6vWerLoivJWqWnBs2788wmfmGlFru+F19EXnmArWGEg6XCUwbqZ8WuAk= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4d04:: with SMTP id a4mr9734046ybb.153.1587674443304; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:40:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200206101833.GA20943@ming.t460p> <20200206211222.83170-1-sqazi@google.com> <5707b17f-e5d7-c274-de6a-694098c4e9a2@acm.org> <10c64a02-91fe-c2af-4c0c-dc9677f9b223@acm.org> <016647fc-1d7b-7127-68aa-044d4230a22d@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <016647fc-1d7b-7127-68aa-044d4230a22d@kernel.dk> From: Salman Qazi Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:40:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Limit number of items taken from the I/O scheduler in one go To: Jens Axboe Cc: Jesse Barnes , Doug Anderson , Bart Van Assche , Ming Lei , linux-block , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Gwendal Grignou , Hannes Reinecke , Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org I had posted a version on Feb 7th, but I guess I neglected to explicitly label it as v2. I am sorry I am not well-acquainted with the processes here. On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:34 PM Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 4/23/20 2:13 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Jens, Bart, Ming, any update here? Or is this already applied (I didn't check)? > > No updates on my end. I was expecting that a v2 would be posted after > all the discussion on it, but that doesn't seem to be the case. > > -- > Jens Axboe >