From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B417C433E2 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13E0C21D43 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="mIMELpfe" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 13E0C21D43 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-mentees-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9465A87173; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:03:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5EiQwLiS5ekQ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F51687024; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5E9C0859; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683D0C0051 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57958204B0 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:03:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ykMcgdltWbE for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:03:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-il1-f178.google.com (mail-il1-f178.google.com [209.85.166.178]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 042BA1FEAE for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-il1-f178.google.com with SMTP id a8so2745406ilk.1 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 05:03:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CfaBd1Efs+fr0WAt+V/T41dVtRutX500qu13nkv9XMo=; b=mIMELpfeqMzT6MvX0WsB239HoRkzLsdYJIgrEq5eU8Sen9AASMVBCgLI1kJh99yfFv Q9/VUecQFWsfGBn3NSBGhwVxVBaGYmgLOovSUXpiUH9zN0dOYsD9lRAz3WqL3ju0gH0B 5boLn3gHfOHdnNGX/NdIF+UR24mw4DGoqzMSUWS5rwS38+c+BAgv5cqVo1CqYJB6T4ky EXxHfYKFALMcCGI6InQsnA/PtJYREq61tZyGC5coT+x9ic11Lvo+qrBW1j0MILOs2O2q MxSf0Nny7wupiH47ppPaDQdkb/1bKonxWAiZ2dg1A54pTD0jSRd8yUyspMJONwC7/7M7 EozQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CfaBd1Efs+fr0WAt+V/T41dVtRutX500qu13nkv9XMo=; b=G00qbyAvGlyY9a8HURLnigIm2ZXFCw2t+GlfDMl1YIrpmSTudzKIdiV1OIzTLQHyJg OiqGBXExJKIHASotTqGu16zvSSXDkmv4NT7e9nJT4DHj1XyfDWVe8pl8+uCgD+dzDbpc ZQlS+CzNI07fnw0GZBk9D7/UUkagB5XxzdAlH0Q0fFZY4wKQDUplDwwcXt6FU1bS71mF nEZ487NTuliGNVmZk4wJ0AuJS5Z9N61Fubt8m+D4hySFZWIyqoS+uz/PbzbXuhQQ2tEa HQ2G/AIsJAKFqwZMcAzdoUhqae8S06GJTdjpGmSbUfxca6cE0QSIsJI+9u8rHkDzMPRu GQGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531iV94oPrPf3TZ2Zts0eHzjAXmx9tScjKEjbIEumvlNanxiwlwY tmwbwlYG+t/XqCHByc3SpL6h4MOlgBlNVhWuwmI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKgLwnBVhi9vkKWm/zxCfEMT5BJrhY2LRMGJf1tXfTRFStWY+M1dy4UXcBQ6BJJ8LenTzG4atleeGyPCjlAhc= X-Received: by 2002:a92:dc43:: with SMTP id x3mr16128142ilq.199.1600171421172; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 05:03:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Lukas Bulwahn Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:03:29 +0200 Message-ID: To: Himadri Pandya Cc: syzkaller , linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] Question regarding marking bugs as "invalid" X-BeenThere: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-kernel-mentees-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Linux-kernel-mentees" On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:52 PM Himadri Pandya wrote: > > Hi, > > Is it correct to mark bugs as "invalid" if they have reproducers but > the reproducer doesn't trigger any issue on testing current status? If > not, then what should be done about such bugs? > > Thanks & Regards, > Himadri > Himadri, if possible try to determine which commit fixed the issue the reproducer triggered. You can potentially bisect with the reproducer on the git history or you can simply look in the git log of the affected files if someone mentioned fixing something related to the trigger. That helps to make sure we do not just close reproducers that just need a lot of time, configuration or luck to hit a certain crash. Lukas _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees