All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
To: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>, CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
	Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] ksmbd: a bunch of patches
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:32:25 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd8R2OQ3=m8HjUffph5+hw_D2KaT60ZDsYmEtCqEFE3gQQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0132d0cb-5efd-f042-d8d6-720e7f3dc69b@samba.org>

2021-09-30 2:18 GMT+09:00, Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>:
> Am 29.09.21 um 19:11 schrieb Steve French:
>> gitnub is fine for many things, and we can automated "kernel
>> development process"
>> things presumably with github easier than alternatives:
>> - running "scripts/checkpatch"
>> - make with C=1 and "_CHECK_ENDIAN" support turned on
>> - kick off smbtorture tests (as Namjae already does in his branches in
>> github)
>
> you can also add "doing review". :)
>
> As for running tests: I want that as well! :) How can I get that? Maybe
> other want to run CI on their patches too before posting them.
>
>> BUT ... we have to ensure a couple things.
>> - we don't annoy Linus (and linux-next and stable maintainers) by doing
>> things
>> like web merges in github (he complained about the
>> meaningless/distracting
>> github web ui empty merge messages)
>
> as said before: just don't do the merge there, just the review. That's
> the way Samba has been doing it for years. Are you actually aware of the
> current Samba workflow?
Is it friendly to new developers? I know samba workflow now too. New
developers can do everything easily by simply subscribing to the
mailing list. And do we review only the SMB protocol on github? If we
review and discuss kernel common code usage and touching, it should be
visible to the component kernel maintainers as well.

And is the review history likely to be discarded on github? Doesn't it
get thrown away the moment you change or update a patch? Also, review
discussions left on each individual's github cannot be easily searched
like mailing list.
>
> -slow
>
> --
> Ralph Boehme, Samba Team                 https://samba.org/
> SerNet Samba Team Lead      https://sernet.de/en/team-samba
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-30  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-26 13:55 Namjae Jeon
2021-09-26 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ksmbd: add the check to vaildate if stream protocol length exceeds maximum value Namjae Jeon
2021-09-26 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ksmbd: add validation in smb2_ioctl Namjae Jeon
2021-09-26 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ksmbd: add request buffer validation in smb2_set_info Namjae Jeon
2021-09-26 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ksmbd: check strictly data area in ksmbd_smb2_check_message() Namjae Jeon
2021-09-26 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ksmbd: add validation in smb2 negotiate Namjae Jeon
2021-09-26 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] ksmbd: a bunch of patches Ralph Boehme
2021-09-26 15:32   ` Namjae Jeon
2021-09-27 15:42 ` Ralph Boehme
2021-09-27 23:57   ` Namjae Jeon
2021-09-28  3:26     ` Ralph Boehme
2021-09-28 13:43       ` Ralph Boehme
2021-09-28 14:23         ` Namjae Jeon
2021-09-28 16:33           ` Ralph Boehme
2021-09-28 17:33             ` Jeremy Allison
2021-09-29 15:28               ` Tom Talpey
2021-09-29 15:42                 ` Jeremy Allison
2021-09-29 16:38                   ` Ralph Boehme
2021-09-29 16:45                     ` Tom Talpey
2021-09-29 17:08                       ` Ralph Boehme
2021-09-29 17:11                       ` Steve French
2021-09-29 17:18                         ` Ralph Boehme
2021-09-30  0:32                           ` Namjae Jeon [this message]
2021-09-30  0:51                             ` Hyunchul Lee
2021-09-30  7:57                             ` Ralph Boehme
2021-09-28 23:27           ` Namjae Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKYAXd8R2OQ3=m8HjUffph5+hw_D2KaT60ZDsYmEtCqEFE3gQQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=jra@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=slow@samba.org \
    --cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] ksmbd: a bunch of patches' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.