From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762548Ab3DCFyr (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 01:54:47 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:60246 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752486Ab3DCFyp (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 01:54:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1364799360-23145-6-git-send-email-jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com> References: <1364799360-23145-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com> <1364799360-23145-6-git-send-email-jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:54:44 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] f2fs: check completion of foreground GC From: Namjae Jeon To: Jaegeuk Kim Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2013/4/1, Jaegeuk Kim : > The foreground GCs are triggered under not enough free sections. > So, we should not skip moving valid blocks in the victim segments. > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Looks good to me~ Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon Thanks.