From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIPt0-00005J-6M for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:40:55 +0200 Received: by obbuo13 with SMTP id uo13so3337831obb.6 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:31:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=AUrtV2yxCSamqBqMrlskdPZn50SP1N2eKFYBq7Bgbnk=; b=TWkgeUqR6+Eri6SuSsLe2oulnb4j1Z/dYrXdVc5yPH9aQ5cxlTxgzY4LX0rUhhTJyA 1tMYJBA6gF3+m5xebjrGlO7wEGYsF7kGF8ra9Hbf3bMWndOlSWfJBmUxXtMaqdNwCwEU qrwz3DQvdSPicCadfWwuyQ9X62wTpG+NwG3QhOQHkqkPk1Q0VUCwp4gT46qSqDc688Wq r2PGL0U077cranGAU0UTKtGWlrHttL4YBgAEuGrM+zLLrKyGuAX8EIS2FxczsN66Lc8n fTOM9j/mXESSIBCIxOcQb7MGctgtgCQChzpmPFQVbQM0A/2Yrm5pYhHNXmlefZzdNu+L D8/Q== Received: by 10.182.127.20 with SMTP id nc20mr4562276obb.66.1334259093268; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:31:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: swaplinker@gmail.com Received: by 10.60.168.172 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:31:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7E680CB2A76BB8438D08CF13C09FC53A46B06325@FMSMSX151.amr.corp.intel.com> <4F84D58F.8020608@gmail.com> <1334221321.31685.24.camel@ted> <4543FDF1-0512-4B36-ABB3-DBB957B86E88@dominion.thruhere.net> From: Julian Pidancet Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:31:13 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bfBCy_6JEL9EG2MwKNvSjVFoKRQ Message-ID: To: Khem Raj Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Yocto Project 1.2 M4 schedule X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:40:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > I think that string is fine as long as its just for yocto but I think > for OE-Core we are going to do a General release > so tagging that with something yocto project will be very confusing > unless we plan to do different releases of OE-Core for general > availability > and yocto project. I dont think we have bandwidth for that. And since > poky repository makes a copy of OE-Core metadata it can be tagged in > yoctoproject specific tags > In case there is an oe-core general availability release separated from the yocto release, when would that happen ? Is there anything planned yet ? -- Julian