All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Backport request for commit 579b7c582 (drm/nouveau/pmu: do not assume a PMU is present)
@ 2016-01-06 14:23 ` Ilia Mirkin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ilia Mirkin @ 2016-01-06 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: Alexandre Courbot, Ben Skeggs, nouveau

This commit should be backported to kernel 4.3 (apologies for
line-wrapping). Without it, we get a null deref (i.e. oops) on GF117
GPUs which for one reason or another don't have the PMU hooked up.
That should be fixed in its own right, but that's a separate matter.
The issue was introduced in commit e2ca4e7d6e (drm/nouveau/pmu:
convert to new-style nvkm_subdev)

commit 579b7c58215329803ce184704463de09f0f310ac
Author: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 3 17:39:52 2015 +0900

    drm/nouveau/pmu: do not assume a PMU is present

    Some devices may not have a PMU. Avoid a NULL pointer dereference in
    such cases by checking whether the pointer given to nvkm_pmu_pgob() is
    valid.

    Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
    Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/base.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/base.c
index 27a79c0..d95eb86 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/base.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/base.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 void
 nvkm_pmu_pgob(struct nvkm_pmu *pmu, bool enable)
 {
-       if (pmu->func->pgob)
+       if (pmu && pmu->func->pgob)
                pmu->func->pgob(pmu, enable);
 }

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Backport request for commit 579b7c582 (drm/nouveau/pmu: do not assume a PMU is present)
@ 2016-01-06 14:23 ` Ilia Mirkin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ilia Mirkin @ 2016-01-06 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW, Ben Skeggs

This commit should be backported to kernel 4.3 (apologies for
line-wrapping). Without it, we get a null deref (i.e. oops) on GF117
GPUs which for one reason or another don't have the PMU hooked up.
That should be fixed in its own right, but that's a separate matter.
The issue was introduced in commit e2ca4e7d6e (drm/nouveau/pmu:
convert to new-style nvkm_subdev)

commit 579b7c58215329803ce184704463de09f0f310ac
Author: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 3 17:39:52 2015 +0900

    drm/nouveau/pmu: do not assume a PMU is present

    Some devices may not have a PMU. Avoid a NULL pointer dereference in
    such cases by checking whether the pointer given to nvkm_pmu_pgob() is
    valid.

    Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
    Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/base.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/base.c
index 27a79c0..d95eb86 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/base.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/base.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 void
 nvkm_pmu_pgob(struct nvkm_pmu *pmu, bool enable)
 {
-       if (pmu->func->pgob)
+       if (pmu && pmu->func->pgob)
                pmu->func->pgob(pmu, enable);
 }
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Backport request for commit 579b7c582 (drm/nouveau/pmu: do not assume a PMU is present)
  2016-01-06 14:23 ` Ilia Mirkin
  (?)
@ 2016-02-14 22:12 ` Greg KH
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2016-02-14 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ilia Mirkin; +Cc: stable, Alexandre Courbot, Ben Skeggs, nouveau

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 09:23:20AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> This commit should be backported to kernel 4.3 (apologies for
> line-wrapping). Without it, we get a null deref (i.e. oops) on GF117
> GPUs which for one reason or another don't have the PMU hooked up.
> That should be fixed in its own right, but that's a separate matter.
> The issue was introduced in commit e2ca4e7d6e (drm/nouveau/pmu:
> convert to new-style nvkm_subdev)
> 
> commit 579b7c58215329803ce184704463de09f0f310ac
> Author: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
> Date:   Thu Sep 3 17:39:52 2015 +0900
> 
>     drm/nouveau/pmu: do not assume a PMU is present
> 
>     Some devices may not have a PMU. Avoid a NULL pointer dereference in
>     such cases by checking whether the pointer given to nvkm_pmu_pgob() is
>     valid.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
> 

Now applied, thanks.

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-14 22:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-01-06 14:23 Backport request for commit 579b7c582 (drm/nouveau/pmu: do not assume a PMU is present) Ilia Mirkin
2016-01-06 14:23 ` Ilia Mirkin
2016-02-14 22:12 ` Greg KH

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.