From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shubhrajyoti Datta Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c: xiic: Replace spinlock with mutex Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:50:21 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1447681325-30914-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <1447681325-30914-3-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]:36772 "EHLO mail-qk0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751094AbbKQFUW (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:20:22 -0500 Received: by qkda6 with SMTP id a6so52343505qkd.3 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:20:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Wolfram Sang , Shubhrajyoti Datta , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >> All protected sections are only called from sleep-able context, so there is >> no need to use a spinlock. > > Looks good to me. Feel free to add my reviewed by. Reviewed-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta