From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08D6C433E2 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6249F20715 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="PoIztMw/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726239AbgINQJF (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:09:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726306AbgINQEf (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:04:35 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x242.google.com (mail-lj1-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::242]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6025C061351 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x242.google.com with SMTP id k25so122282ljg.9 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:04:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zc4tFKUvGTvhn1QE7lK3J14QslNtyRPDaXb9i1LUKBU=; b=PoIztMw/R8ooNdzbG8hdAqllhURlvNlmHAj13cJlsx+VQxVA0IluJ4j+Wd9a4my2Y1 /pQDeqLDYKyTakj0x4wR66a1BJevAJm6+wU+zIbTO3xhQgF2ZqTUMjJhTcrp3eezoF0+ tot2YkDb338wdSMsA15VrOfGdGPz3hX9e579Ew6o9sOQyRF9ggAHHHy9AeQ1v980m3+u Sdo4NNrWo2XAuoIj/J0tKzkJpvX70SzH09OczLTEuEzYsUqao8JyPeX62wlNavx3aP9f Ja6YlmlCrOsdYYZMUcxRa4qMab78DD/1fQIQHey4vU7bdS0910CwYYyknZrzAY11hR17 UVyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zc4tFKUvGTvhn1QE7lK3J14QslNtyRPDaXb9i1LUKBU=; b=Kp+F5EHLuhc/B/smzh2JwgSYc51ghEP9Z+feq1sAt+mJwn3MS7XadzhYLZX1jh/19R wGZBdctLKX6kzG5UAvfevyMAgsSUkPejqIEouE7mxk16Dt/Yuf8LzFoBSb6HZ4kHpMZj QKoqAtywGVxjdBEyGuWydCCkekfwHiXiNNyrBW39Ur5KusZi87qz3p3uIipbxCV+6DhJ eygdUAIxi6XgxTFFaDl6QIts3APfXSLJl2b4t38Up+77Bu3jI5kyRu6Jbg7VU2RoMBAS 1/H+NfnMCWUUqbRftBX+4PnxzsMkGQZ+hb1XOEEGhQpTUj5D+Cn+xtIdhoC0jWbPybcP eFeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UrU9/0hs39wymhy2UzS+/203EQbaYLkjdAhOHbojBrh1IK5VN 5tIDC+DD9rRFzm8gBUpU+iHGZvjQ8+QnUsnLJxHCDA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDW6NFg3aLpV0oKAsADv+HHyydbuH4uopuuJDo1C12WMKg/tvvHOOGO33+w8bpE5H8Pmfgmo+xH6EAnKImQkU= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:81d7:: with SMTP id s23mr5669605ljg.69.1600099454139; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:04:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200914100340.17608-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20200914114202.GQ1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200914155059.GF3117@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20200914155059.GF3117@suse.de> From: Vincent Guittot Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:04:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched/fair: Improve fairness between cfs tasks To: Mel Gorman Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , linux-kernel , Valentin Schneider , Phil Auld Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 17:51, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:42:02PM +0200, peterz@infradead.org wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:03:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > Vincent Guittot (4): > > > sched/fair: relax constraint on task's load during load balance > > > sched/fair: reduce minimal imbalance threshold > > > sched/fair: minimize concurrent LBs between domain level > > > sched/fair: reduce busy load balance interval > > > > I see nothing objectionable there, a little more testing can't hurt, but > > I'm tempted to apply them. > > > > Phil, Mel, any chance you can run them through your respective setups? > > They're queued but the test grid is backlogged at the moment. It'll be > a few days before the tests complete. Thanks Mel > > -- > Mel Gorman > SUSE Labs