From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BEEC35E04 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6AE2084E for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="CE5SJGtV" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730901AbgBYOx5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:53:57 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:42455 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729489AbgBYOx5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:53:57 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id 83so9945180lfh.9 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 06:53:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Xt/wWhOlTt8p3C5+NXIFHX4ZEi4eWU8DqAZIDXX33/8=; b=CE5SJGtVy3XV0e5b2esEZytrlbaIIZXk1k+zoMBg/HQ0ASUdTbDvFXCW/4FsTRXtyY 18O3on0BNjjHVwk7fHUiwKY+iwJZLSN9q0ku/6WGtlHhhuYQO61huYOw7u7gEGiFzKBW W3Z5rJFz8XazVGRg5D4UhMfXUhH+u+O1ZciirXngKrJ+xauCbtFH4Ri753UFbjPGjynd czgZYRs+7iQ5X8RbQkdQoqADOzq8q4bL/G6xPCuLKgpTKFY4v+MLw+E1kmRz49e7krxn dU3TmgyAH89eLlS+bVuwAGCcLzEFIp40QBZgjvONrYoBvAKpO6MGUPlsNiYpcYtKXUfH sAtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Xt/wWhOlTt8p3C5+NXIFHX4ZEi4eWU8DqAZIDXX33/8=; b=XQDh8k+eOd/61B3l6XekfH/lLmTsadtfw3OCcLcOy4xeQA68WIU1r48nalSRGZtbkZ 74oG3FSR9ZikCQbvSnhsOQZu/Wt3MQ8HSpFIWoX5jcjsJOzOCmRXzhpW3j3otH927F/J DjNMThytNAU7yhNMCWGKP09qYsQ8dFr2v//1TzMNmVhS+dEKXfW6FkcPerzJJuQYN8wp D8R60ICSgoa+KGZXSJTrktfbScB7rRz6hu/I2984mPWO+Kuk8A/GE3Ozq1daZW7Hn3sR 56kd26ErXPNmNhzTn0mffbRQZ0CahXqVU3ugP/wG7PsS+ip3r7OHM5SrJKmhblrkGb65 Jf2A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWASq037cz77zwBH7qDssSLHRQooUleWPYyAXBH7Sxqnx8hYeuo k2v8Yau/pI+N1fkTFv8wcyiU3vMrrdIN5KgozXfKng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxrjLKs7J1HoXBE045RYrnnvUJLZSYEDFqoQc6nXOJPfWxG/Gcgk381zcGTm4VVAMqIb9INUjc05A4gWkEDOOE= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5633:: with SMTP id b19mr20123317lff.149.1582642434876; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 06:53:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200224095223.13361-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <20200224151641.GA24316@gmail.com> <20200225115901.GB3466@techsingularity.net> <20200225142430.GC3466@techsingularity.net> In-Reply-To: <20200225142430.GC3466@techsingularity.net> From: Vincent Guittot Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:53:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load balancer v6 To: Mel Gorman Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Valentin Schneider , Phil Auld , Hillf Danton , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 15:24, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 02:28:16PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > > > > Will do. > > > > > > However I noticed that "sched/fair: Fix find_idlest_group() to handle > > > CPU affinity" did not make it to tip/sched/core. Peter seemed to think it > > > was fine. Was it rejected or is it just sitting in Peter's queue somewhere? > > > > The patch has already reached mainline through tip/sched-urgent-for-linus > > > > Bah, I pasted the wrong subject. I am thinking of your > patch "sched/fair: fix statistics for find_idlest_group" -- > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200218144534.4564-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org/ > It still appears to be relevant or did I miss something else? you're right, it's not yet in tip/sched/core but most probably in Peter's queue > > -- > Mel Gorman > SUSE Labs