From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754817AbaIKMVE (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 08:21:04 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.219.51]:41735 "EHLO mail-oa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754271AbaIKMVD (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 08:21:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140911111736.GV3190@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1409051215-16788-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1409051215-16788-10-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20140911111736.GV3190@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com> From: Vincent Guittot Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:20:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] sched: add usage_load_avg To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , Preeti U Murthy , Russell King - ARM Linux , LAK , Rik van Riel , Morten Rasmussen , Mike Galbraith , Nicolas Pitre , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , Daniel Lezcano , Dietmar Eggemann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11 September 2014 13:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> }; >> > > Man, I should go look at Yuyang's rewrite of this all again. I just > tried to figure out the decay stuff and my head hurts ;-) Regarding Yuyang's rewrite, i had a patch above his patches to add the running figure that i haven't sent yet From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vincent.guittot@linaro.org (Vincent Guittot) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:20:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v5 09/12] sched: add usage_load_avg In-Reply-To: <20140911111736.GV3190@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1409051215-16788-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1409051215-16788-10-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20140911111736.GV3190@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11 September 2014 13:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> }; >> > > Man, I should go look at Yuyang's rewrite of this all again. I just > tried to figure out the decay stuff and my head hurts ;-) Regarding Yuyang's rewrite, i had a patch above his patches to add the running figure that i haven't sent yet