From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755357Ab3KLMgE (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:36:04 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.219.43]:48947 "EHLO mail-oa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755141Ab3KLMgA (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:36:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1382097147-30088-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:35:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v5 00/14] sched: packing tasks From: Vincent Guittot To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Paul Turner , Morten Rasmussen , Chris Metcalf , Tony Luck , Preeti U Murthy , linaro-kernel , "len.brown@intel.com" , Lukasz Majewski , Jonathan Corbet , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Paul McKenney , Arjan van de Ven , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Lezcano , Tuukka Tikkanen , Alex Shi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11 November 2013 12:33, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > (cross-posting to linux-pm as it was agreed to follow up on this list) > > > So, IMO, defining the power topology is a good starting point and I > think it's better to separate the patches from the energy saving > algorithms like packing. We need to agree on what information we have Daniel and Tuukka who are working in cpuidle consolidation in the scheduler, are also interested in using similar topology information than me. I have made 1 patchset only because the information was only used here. So I can probably make a separate patchset of the power topology description in DT. Vincent > (C-state details, coupling, power gating) and what we can/need to > expose to the scheduler. This can be revisited once we start > implementing/refining the energy awareness. > > > -- > Catalin