From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754996AbbCYSJI (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:09:08 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com ([209.85.218.53]:35579 "EHLO mail-oi0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754976AbbCYSJE (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:09:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150325173309.GS21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1425052454-25797-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1425052454-25797-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20150323131905.GF23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150325173309.GS21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Vincent Guittot Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:08:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/11] sched: Make sched entity usage tracking scale-invariant To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , Preeti U Murthy , Morten Rasmussen , Kamalesh Babulal , Rik van Riel , Mike Galbraith , Nicolas Pitre , Dietmar Eggemann , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , Paul Turner , Ben Segall Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25 March 2015 at 18:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:00:57AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> On 23 March 2015 at 14:19, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:54:07PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> > >> >> + unsigned long scale_freq = arch_scale_freq_capacity(NULL, cpu); >> > >> >> + sa->running_avg_sum += delta_w * scale_freq >> >> + >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; >> > >> > so the only thing that could be improved is somehow making this >> > multiplication go away when the arch doesn't implement the function. >> > >> > But I'm not sure how to do that without #ifdef. >> > >> > Maybe a little something like so then... that should make the compiler >> > get rid of those multiplications unless the arch needs them. >> >> yes, it removes useless multiplication when not used by an arch. >> It also adds a constraint on the arch side which have to define >> arch_scale_freq_capacity like below: >> >> #define arch_scale_freq_capacity xxx_arch_scale_freq_capacity >> with xxx_arch_scale_freq_capacity an architecture specific function > > Yeah, but it not being weak should make that a compile time warn/fail, > which should be pretty easy to deal with. > >> If it sounds acceptable i can update the patch with your proposal ? > > I'll stick it to the end, I just wanted to float to patch to see if > people had better solutions. ok. all other methods that i have tried, was removing the optimization when default arch_scale_freq_capacity was used