From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753769AbcHJTQi (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:16:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:36422 "EHLO mail-wm0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753696AbcHJTQe (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:16:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1470824847-5316-1-git-send-email-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> References: <1470824847-5316-1-git-send-email-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> From: Vincent Guittot Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:28:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix load_above_capacity fixed point arithmetic width To: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , Morten Rasmussen , Yuyang Du Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10 August 2016 at 12:27, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > Since commit 2159197d6677 ("sched/core: Enable increased load resolution > on 64-bit kernels") we now have two different fixed point units for > load. > load_above_capacity has to have 10 bit fixed point unit like PELT > whereas NICE_0_LOAD has 20 bit fixed point unit on 64-bit kernels. > Fix this by scaling down NICE_0_LOAD when multiplying > load_above_capacity with it. > > Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann > Acked-by: Morten Rasmussen > --- > kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 4088eedea763..fe4093807852 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -7147,7 +7147,7 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s > load_above_capacity = busiest->sum_nr_running * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE; > if (load_above_capacity > busiest->group_capacity) { > load_above_capacity -= busiest->group_capacity; > - load_above_capacity *= NICE_0_LOAD; > + load_above_capacity *= scale_load_down(NICE_0_LOAD); FWIW, Acked-by: Vincent Guittot > load_above_capacity /= busiest->group_capacity; > } else > load_above_capacity = ~0UL; > -- > 1.9.1 >