From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26153C4360C for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 06:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33AE206B7 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 06:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FjA45/SA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725804AbfI0Ghp (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 02:37:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f65.google.com ([209.85.208.65]:43707 "EHLO mail-ed1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725769AbfI0Ghp (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 02:37:45 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f65.google.com with SMTP id r9so1312998edl.10 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 23:37:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=0NsNt7JNJ0TyVPoe3/Hk57EdCDt5zxUp8rgDsUl2Et8=; b=FjA45/SAsG4sVJ15HonBZsbfGpW29UJmVIrt/1bETZwISqVmFuJT4Xc0cX61JwYz1M T3Zf4TkgrhPbzthMFDj9C6RGu0fMTsgNAX+2lQ3US8gBRNcF8+V7qeL1rfQ0Uh30pZNp szhqjiSyrMHNk7jP2p4AVF+JDKbmPsyJqxCkb/9kB9HWAdf/+6pvOE9wVy4cTTLYbqGY balFqL4OGWf2qncvQvjQX3rtTsxA+7WlCSwAJor1hot+Dq5zotfAXR1cjwfeVCc3KILC 7pnCAiO/PPs/tc/+cUCpsVDrYT5VtA/+N5pvVSLJqdE+t5MoKzitpkf5yDCnKBRSS1zN XEDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0NsNt7JNJ0TyVPoe3/Hk57EdCDt5zxUp8rgDsUl2Et8=; b=FfoWeZkfSzKJ9HGKsC9lajj+5vApirpq87G/1YFqFxUwHrhj+qRRUaZJ1cTBohBbfi Ve0ycGTqCcw9745qGn6fbRCulhZ8hVhnCPcziLiZAwdfeTO84TpLYEhK+ZKnGqMLg7ZO FI6SYRhKoKsKG/Hqr7yOcTwNnzGjDdwGzmgVbBYQ2p/jpMrHuMEemWzoKRzpbPU8d5w2 FhN+lAMyBxkiciWh26mjEGQAbhxbVze7+gHIgsm0Y/dtIpofp7Q6EbtnIMzXRRHU1AnK 7zjzFrx1YCcmd51JghJXqdhIJ62GV5kwC5rGKBMB5Rp47ClcLERB8jFHMMhv1AgFXOQa sw0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVZBk3l3XemHX3KGdO55p9f9kAxbVAoY/DkK84rGGbCcE+16Xe9 Xgi2bviHlYNceucCX1K11RK7GuLqJw+iQxIg2Ee8AA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxWOnmZUw2xzJJY1m0QAHLlbMxh/EMBOdD+DVzaij4wMlkJ8+b+zRYTLdrXwed0nzz+vHaLEcq6R8bIBxlTslE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1858:: with SMTP id v24mr2746853edy.130.1569566263689; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 23:37:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:37:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: To: nilsocket Cc: linux-man Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Hello On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 08:26, nilsocket wrote: > > In http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/epoll_pwait.2.html#NOTES , > through out this section `epoll_wait()` is used. but only once > `epoll_pwait()` is used, I think it's a typo mistake. > > Current: > While one thread is blocked in a call to epoll_pwait() > > Expected Change: > While one thread is blocked in a call to epoll_wait() Thanks. Fixed! Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/