From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D303C433DF for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 22:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB1F2206A1 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 22:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Ibg5IxOw"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="dgJladsD" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DB1F2206A1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=jGXuPP+aeCzPmOIcxTQSDjFye7mRSOA8NHbFVMKsfv8=; b=Ibg5IxOwpC4/4jGmude6sUyzz adWlaaCo4wi61GEjTT0xbO+pEKAR419IqZZko3n/hWSxRgeOfJHQqD03Eu+YacRBHODyBemFfmUVW cC8iKiDj0L8JR5viPStGikgF2pGRJRS93s4su9F6BXKXXypXjRQQIz/rtvtXD6L2CXyYKvMMVE3H8 6LgLe/xSZdhbE1fVwgXojDZ1K6kg9BbGDqty8u3Iw95+q3fCqBGNQeRS1dQvCJLa0ivFOV5AnLWOo QFoREMdJbkAiX1HsTisq6wlq9ztJPTA9vY4/HJPT4lU4BViO7YoLQ2TUO8vDy6taam0UxYxoC4e5h tN+FIhL3A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jtekv-0006uK-8p; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 22:11:01 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-xd41.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d41]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jteks-0006tL-Pa for linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 22:10:59 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-xd41.google.com with SMTP id v6so4003097iob.4 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 15:10:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jxaP2F3MjYcUJCpKXAz5DHVLAycUL1+ajoVvxtTdGOk=; b=dgJladsDBiApJtRamLDHg7RIv5oDhrrLbQwr7H0NJKmzwfHNtUFLWroTrONaW5aRNI 8qqpFMF5sbEAHrp0yfnbq5uSpnnYG3k3WloM4nQ93rFDkw4jgiVrg4ul4DtfKvYWcKF0 6MJ6Wxpd6GqPmzMGGjBXH7ig9Aisd5HBSEkyj3eMneVvslgI+kdEPyomQQVfVXfKd4Hf HcVvyfzUPGLI90e6f5zcIZRv0fsBUBI1Xp1j/jjkAhf1TgiPfs76D8fktbLaL21wgM94 Et5I72TknaPLF13kcQHs67rlnZ4a5v1lFrRmPQWvNaLFODuGp9Sk8ft2h97sbrLitLZ4 rfPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jxaP2F3MjYcUJCpKXAz5DHVLAycUL1+ajoVvxtTdGOk=; b=kx9VgIzw5K6vBEE7HUsUAbHzbJX3N/dmwQfcN38xKEHt9KCF54M7XuWql3eq81KK/F UGBohldj3HgNQJPxrXmXqAoUeP6oU1ClhucZrCxVVrxuuFeJeKSjcen2+FrkbGjEunDi gxNlfUdpvoLcHWSZJJaTgEp6irVOTTfC5WkkNN/QNYN3K8rTAYnT6mvLisg4uoThkW9D o0LqA39Ze38T5B7pxRU/f7JH8oBnh17QiuHXaQNuTWT07eSRJaN4s+GVBJg2oxTbF3Eg LoYhP5Upju4hk8P/kdaVssW+E/iLg9FWj1mxIbAkYoSYG8wbwOTZ2jzhRHXyaibjgFn2 cIJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530fc7QtRERA6Y44mNV8oRe9UCBEk9Oh2MPkItVdeW+g1uFjmwe/ JegNQd25Ca6lyh0Tl7D1yKhomWmW5tnG0Wd26Fs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxcYVJ1YFs3KEDP6LuxC0GV/zAt+5Bt4Qz5XlZnpW7qlQ+VtG7lsbraCnD2OGyIF2f07pakBkqOGCSZ/BYev+Q= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9306:: with SMTP id l6mr45499615ion.105.1594332654648; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 15:10:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8ec1c7a1-dd77-5f1f-a2a4-11d214152a0d@linaro.org> <20200707205506.31537-1-vgupta@synopsys.com> <273d42de-dc2b-2101-8705-04b399bd46cc@linaro.org> <2c7b73bd-d738-6af8-90b0-514ad22d929f@synopsys.com> <130fbd5a-cec8-4930-0b5e-da53d8d582ea@synopsys.com> <5f20da5f-8612-099b-3257-56c18f10cfa0@synopsys.com> In-Reply-To: <5f20da5f-8612-099b-3257-56c18f10cfa0@synopsys.com> From: Alistair Francis Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 15:01:02 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ARC testsuite regressions (was Re: [PATCH v7.2 07/13] ARC: Linux Syscall Interface) To: Vineet Gupta X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200709_181058_852543_F21B9972 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.12 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on Synopsys ARC Processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: arcml , "libc-alpha@sourceware.org" , Adhemerval Zanella Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-snps-arc" Errors-To: linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:36 PM Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote: > > On 7/9/20 2:13 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote: > >> Rebased ARC port on master and fired a build-many-glibcs now (expect some > >> abilist updates). Will do a full testsuite run > > > > No regressions in sysvipc tests ! > > But quite a few regressions. Baseline is ARC port off of upstream 81b1c8cbb5b4 > "(hurd: Simplify usleep timeout computation)" and failures below seen in ARC port > off of today's master ffd178c651b8 "(sysv: linux: Add 64-bit time_t variant for > shmctl)" > > FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic > FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic2 > FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic3 > FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic4 > FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic5 > FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym > FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym-static > FAIL: elf/tst-single_threaded-static-dlopen > FAIL: elf/tst-tls9-static I see the same recent-ish regressions for RV32. Alistair > .. > > Could it be due to recent TLS optimizations... > > | $ cat dlfcn/tststatic.out > | .../build/libc.so.6: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block > > -Vineet _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc