From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br73Q-0000cL-R1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 13:29:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br73P-0000n8-3t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 13:29:28 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::243]:35344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br73O-0000mW-Tq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 13:29:27 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x243.google.com with SMTP id n202so12149335oig.2 for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:29:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: alistair23@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <874m4yx82t.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> References: <0c4600f5c922569a57f4e9a9f1b6b4b5469b2a4c.1475102513.git.alistair.francis@xilinx.com> <871t03jbxh.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <874m4yx82t.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Alistair Francis Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:28:55 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 2/2] docs: Add a generic loader explanation document List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Alistair Francis , Peter Maydell , Peter Crosthwaite , Paolo Bonzini , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Christopher Covington On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Alistair Francis writes: > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> Alistair Francis writes: >>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis >>>> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell >>>> --- >>>> V11: >>>> - Fix corrections >>>> V10: >>>> - Split the data loading and PC setting >>>> V9: >>>> - Clarify the image loading options >>>> V8: >>>> - Improve documentation >>>> V6: >>>> - Fixup documentation >>>> V4: >>>> - Re-write to be more comprehensive >>>> >>>> docs/generic-loader.txt | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 docs/generic-loader.txt >>>> >>>> diff --git a/docs/generic-loader.txt b/docs/generic-loader.txt >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 0000000..d1f8ce3 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/docs/generic-loader.txt >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ >>>> +Copyright (c) 2016 Xilinx Inc. >>>> + >>>> +This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later. See >>>> +the COPYING file in the top-level directory. >>>> + >>>> + >>>> +The 'loader' device allows the user to load multiple images or values into >>>> +QEMU at startup. >>>> + >>>> +Loading Data into Memory Values >>>> +--------------------- >>>> +The loader device allows memory values to be set from the command line. This >>>> +can be done by following the syntax below: >>>> + >>>> + -device loader,addr=,data=,data-len= >>>> + [,data-be=][,cpu-num=] >>>> + >>>> + - The address to store the data in. >>>> + - The value to be written to the address. The maximum size of >>>> + the data is 8 bytes. >>>> + - The length of the data in bytes. This argument must be >>>> + included if the data argument is. >>>> + - Set to true if the data to be stored on the guest should be >>>> + written as big endian data. The default is to write little >>>> + endian data. >>>> + - The number of the CPU's address space where the data should >>>> + be loaded. If not specified the address space of the first >>>> + CPU is used. >>>> + >>>> +For all values both hex and decimal values are allowed. By default the values >>>> +will be parsed as decimal. To use hex values the user should prefix the number >>>> +with a '0x'. >>> >>> Unless you bypassed QemuOpts number parsing somehow, octal works as >>> well. In case you did bypass: don't! Command line consistency matters. >>> Follow-up patch reverting the bypass would be required. >>> >>> Not sure we want to document QemuOpts number syntax everywhere we >>> explain how a certain feature uses the command line. A pointer to the >>> canonical place could be better. Anyway, not something that needs >>> fixing before we commit. >> >> I didn't bypass it, octal should work as well. I have clarified that a >> bit in the doc. > > Thanks. > >>>> + >>>> +An example of loading value 0x8000000e to address 0xfd1a0104 is: >>>> + -device loader,addr=0xfd1a0104,data=0x8000000e,data-len=4 >>>> + >>>> +Setting a CPU's Program Counter >>>> +--------------------- >>>> +The loader device allows the CPU's PC to be set from the command line. This >>>> +can be done by following the syntax below: >>>> + >>>> + -device loader,addr=,cpu-num= >>>> + >>>> + - The value to use as the CPU's PC. >>>> + - The number of the CPU whose PC should be set to the >>>> + specified value. >>>> + >>>> +For all values both hex and decimal values are allowed. By default the values >>>> +will be parsed as decimal. To use hex values the user should prefix the number >>>> +with a '0x'. >>>> + >>>> +An example of setting CPU 0's PC to 0x8000 is: >>>> + -device loader,addr=0x8000,cpu-num=0 >>>> + >>>> +Loading Files >>>> +--------------------- >>>> +The loader device also allows files to be loaded into memory. This can be done >>>> +similarly to setting memory values. The syntax is shown below: >>>> + >>>> + -device loader,file=[,addr=][,cpu-num=][,force-raw=] >>>> + >>>> + - A file to be loaded into memory >>>> + - The addr in memory that the file should be loaded. This is >>>> + ignored if you are using an ELF (unless force-raw is true). >>>> + This is required if you aren't loading an ELF. >>>> + - This specifies the CPU that should be used. This is an >>>> + optional argument and will cause the CPU's PC to be set to >>>> + where the image is stored or in the case of an ELF file to >>>> + the value in the header. This option should only be used >>>> + for the boot image. >>>> + This will also cause the image to be written to the specified >>>> + CPU's address space. If not specified, the default is CPU 0. >>> >>> Using @cpu-num both for further specifying the meaning of @addr and for >>> setting that CPU's PC is awkward. Are you sure there will never be a >>> use case where you need to specify the CPU without also setting its PC? >>> >>> To be clear: while I feel this is a question we must discuss and >>> resolve, I don't think we need to hold the series for it. >> >> I agree that this can occur. Internally in the loader framework is a >> set_pc variable. >> >> In the future we can make this user accessible and then allow that to >> decide if the PC should be set or not. > > If you can't do it right away, please document it as restriction, and > add a TODO comment to lift it. I have a patch that adds known restrictions. > >>>> + - Forces the file to be treated as a raw image. This can be >>>> + used to specify the load address of ELF files. >>> >>> "Specifying the load address of an ELF file" sounds like loading a >>> position-independent ELF file at a particular address. But I guess this >>> is actually for loading a file raw even though it is recognized by QEMU >>> as ELF. >> >> This option basically does make an ELF file position-independent as >> the user can control where it is loaded. > > Aha. Then the name "force-raw" is confusing. I disagree. It tells QEMU to treat the image as just a dumb blob, instead of loading it as and ELF file. I thin force-raw makes sense as the user is telling QEMU that the image should be treated as a raw image, no matter what it actually is. Thanks, Alistair > >>>> + >>>> +For all values both hex and decimal values are allowed. By default the values >>>> +will be parsed as decimal. To use hex values the user should prefix the number >>>> +with a '0x'. >>>> + >>>> +An example of loading an ELF file which CPU0 will boot is shown below: >>>> + -device loader,file=./images/boot.elf,cpu-num=0 >>> >>> Naive question: if you want to more than one thing (where "thing" is one >>> of the three cases described above), do you need a separate -device for >>> each, or can you combine them into one? >> >> You can't really squash them together. If you wanted to set two >> registers, you would need two commands. > > That's okay. It just isn't quite obvious to me in the text. > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alistair >> >>> >>> >>> Again, while my questions may lead to improvements, they can be applied >>> on top. >>> >