From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46711) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmjjT-0001sz-Ja for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:46:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmjjS-0001o3-IU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:46:47 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::241]:35603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmjjS-0001nX-Cy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:46:46 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x241.google.com with SMTP id n202so4105805oig.2 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:46:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: alistair23@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <877fa5aiu4.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> References: <877fa5aiu4.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Alistair Francis Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:46:15 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 0/8] Add a generic loader List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Alistair Francis , Peter Maydell , Peter Crosthwaite , Paolo Bonzini , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Christopher Covington On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Alistair Francis writes: > >> This work is based on the original work by Li Guang with extra >> features added by Peter C and myself. >> >> The idea of this loader is to allow the user to load multiple images >> or values into QEMU at startup. >> >> Memory values can be loaded like this: -device loader,addr=0xfd1a0104,data=0x8000000e,data-len=4 >> >> Images can be loaded like this: -device loader,file=./images/u-boot.elf,cpu=0 > > I know it's way too late for design questions, but the thought just > occured to me: -device gives you what you need without defining yet > another command line option (good!), but is it appropriate? It's not > exactly a device... Would -object be a better fit? I honestly don't > know. Paolo? I see your point, but I kind of think it makes sense that everything uses the same command line argument. I image it would be very confusing if we have -device and -object. Then when you want to add something you will need to figure out if it is a device or an object? How do you know which one is which? I agree that technically it isn't a device but I think this is still clear what you are trying to do. Thanks, Alistair > > If this question leads to changes, they can be done on top. > >> This can be useful and we use it a lot in Xilinx to load multiple images >> into a machine at creation (ATF, Kernel and DTB for example). >> >> Tested with the latest Xilinx ZynqMP machine, if I enable EL3 and EL2 I can >> boot ATF through to u-boot using the loader to load the images. >> >> It can also be used to set registers. >> >> This patch series makes the load_elf() function more generic by not >> requiring an architecture. It also adds new functions load_elf_as(), >> load_uimage_as and load_image_targphys_as which allows custom >> AddressSpaces when loading images. >