Re: [PATCH] device_tree: Fix compiler error

[Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 6:08 AM Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de> wrote:
>
> A build with gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110 fails:
>
> ../../../softmmu/device_tree.c: In function ‘qemu_fdt_add_path’:
> ../../../softmmu/device_tree.c:560:18: error: ‘retval’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>   560 |     int namelen, retval;
>       |                  ^~~~~~
>
> This is not a real error, but the compiler can be satisfied with a small change.

Why don't we just initalise retval?

Alistair

>
> Fixes: b863f0b75852 ("device_tree: Add qemu_fdt_add_path")
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
> ---
>  softmmu/device_tree.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu/device_tree.c b/softmmu/device_tree.c
> index 3965c834ca..9e96f5ecd5 100644
> --- a/softmmu/device_tree.c
> +++ b/softmmu/device_tree.c
> @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ int qemu_fdt_add_path(void *fdt, const char *path)
>          return -1;
>      }
>
> -    while (p) {
> +    do {
>          name = p + 1;
>          p = strchr(name, '/');
>          namelen = p != NULL ? p - name : strlen(name);
> @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ int qemu_fdt_add_path(void *fdt, const char *path)
>          }
>
>          parent = retval;
> -    }
> +    } while (p);
>
>      return retval;
>  }
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>