From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0, V2 Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:20:33 +0530 Message-ID: References: <53B4B0B3.9080000@codeaurora.org> <20140703221609.11380.6884@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170]:53157 "EHLO mail-ob0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751236AbaGHEue (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 00:50:34 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id uz6so5842686obc.1 for ; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 21:50:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Turquette Cc: Stephen Boyd , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lists linaro-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Arvind Chauhan , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Sachin Kamat , Thomas P Abraham , Shawn Guo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nishanth Menon , Tomasz Figa , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Kukjin Kim , Michal Simek , Rob Herring , Santosh Shilimkar , Simon Horman On 4 July 2014 09:51, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Yeah, having something like what you suggested from DT is the perfect > solution to get over this. The only reason why I am not touching that here > is to not delay other patches just because of that. > > There are separate threads going on for that and probably somebody > else was trying to push for that. > > That's it, nothing more. I would definitely like to use those bindings instead > of the crazy routines we are trying here, once that is finalized :) Do we have some kind of agreement for this temporary solution? Anyways I will kick the other thread again to resolve the bindings soon. @Stephen: Do you still want find_rate_changer() stuff in this series only and or this can go into 3.17 without anymore changes and lets finalize the bindings Mike suggested and then update this code? -- viresh