From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] ARM: SPEAr: DT updates Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:49:22 +0530 Message-ID: References: <201211121521.58766.arnd@arndb.de> <20121121202405.GA15549@quad.lixom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121121202405.GA15549-O5ziIzlqnXUVNXGz7ipsyg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Olof Johansson Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, spear-devel-nkJGhpqTU55BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, sr-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 22 November 2012 01:54, Olof Johansson wrote: > for-next is LinusW's unstable branch. If the patches have moved over into > his /devel branch we can normally pull them in as a dependency though. Do > you happen to know which patches we need for this in particular, i.e. at > what point we need to pull in the branch? I don't want to have to search > for it if I can avoid and we try to pull in minimal dependencies if > we can, instead of all his staged code. > > We're also running out of time for 3.8 staging, but if you're able to > figure out the above I'll make an attempt to apply the patches from above. Hi Olof, Last week i had chat with Arnd and Linus over Hangout, and following is the status: - Dependency patch of pinctrl is: commit 4ddb1c295752252f61670e35c791bf16e58bbce6 Author: Viresh Kumar Date: Sat Oct 27 15:21:39 2012 +0530 ARM: SPEAr: Add plgpio node in device tree dtsi files And is already in pinctrl/devel branch. And this branch is stable as per Linus. - First patch of this set is applied by Linus in his gpio tree. So, you need to get that branch too. And is present in devel branch as: commit b53bc2819a71099ecfc3d61ba0796b3dcc6be321 Author: Shiraz Hashim Date: Fri Nov 16 10:45:25 2012 +0530 gpio: SPEAr: add spi chipselect control driver -- viresh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:49:22 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 00/14] ARM: SPEAr: DT updates In-Reply-To: <20121121202405.GA15549@quad.lixom.net> References: <201211121521.58766.arnd@arndb.de> <20121121202405.GA15549@quad.lixom.net> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 22 November 2012 01:54, Olof Johansson wrote: > for-next is LinusW's unstable branch. If the patches have moved over into > his /devel branch we can normally pull them in as a dependency though. Do > you happen to know which patches we need for this in particular, i.e. at > what point we need to pull in the branch? I don't want to have to search > for it if I can avoid and we try to pull in minimal dependencies if > we can, instead of all his staged code. > > We're also running out of time for 3.8 staging, but if you're able to > figure out the above I'll make an attempt to apply the patches from above. Hi Olof, Last week i had chat with Arnd and Linus over Hangout, and following is the status: - Dependency patch of pinctrl is: commit 4ddb1c295752252f61670e35c791bf16e58bbce6 Author: Viresh Kumar Date: Sat Oct 27 15:21:39 2012 +0530 ARM: SPEAr: Add plgpio node in device tree dtsi files And is already in pinctrl/devel branch. And this branch is stable as per Linus. - First patch of this set is applied by Linus in his gpio tree. So, you need to get that branch too. And is present in devel branch as: commit b53bc2819a71099ecfc3d61ba0796b3dcc6be321 Author: Shiraz Hashim Date: Fri Nov 16 10:45:25 2012 +0530 gpio: SPEAr: add spi chipselect control driver -- viresh