From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752783Ab3BHFcF (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 00:32:05 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:44238 "EHLO mail-ob0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752707Ab3BHFcC (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 00:32:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2896238.eRV3G7kyl2@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <2896238.eRV3G7kyl2@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:02:01 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9 From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, artem.savkov@gmail.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8 February 2013 05:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I should have done that before, sorry about it. np > Can you please rework this series on top of linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq and > try to avoid introducing new issues this time? Sorry for this. I didn't got any such issues on my system and i tried to think as widely as possible. But still just a human with some mistakes :) > If this works, we'll rebase all of the other new material on top of it, > if possible. To make your life a bit easy, i have got all cpufreq patches, that you & me have got for 3.9, rebased over pm-cpufreq and these are: f3843e0 cpufreq: exynos: simplify .init() for setting policy->cpus 7ea6658 cpufreq: kirkwood: Add a cpufreq driver for Marvell Kirkwood SoCs 6002fd0 cpufreq/x86: Add P-state driver for sandy bridge. bcfe254 cpufreq_stats: do not remove sysfs files if frequency table is not present 6c82b96 cpufreq: Do not track governor name for scaling drivers with internal governors. 2a6df07 cpufreq: Only call cpufreq_out_of_sync() for driver that implement cpufreq_driver.target() 0893112 cpufreq: Retrieve current frequency from scaling drivers with internal governors e034e73 cpufreq: Fix locking issues 003da79 cpufreq: Create a macro for unlock_policy_rwsem{read,write} 0092c75 cpufreq: Remove unused HOTPLUG_CPU code 34d5833 cpufreq: governors: Fix WARN_ON() for multi-policy platforms e1ee7c8 cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to use RCU e076b60 cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to a rwlock 6d919f9 cpufreq: ondemand: Replace down_differential tuner with adj_up_threshold 80dd878 cpufreq / stats: Get rid of CPUFREQ_STATDEVICE_ATTR a7e183d cpufreq: Don't check cpu_online(policy->cpu) 9db0116 cpufreq: add imx6q-cpufreq driver I have pushed them in for-rafael branch in my repo. Look carefully at the first two patches, they were not present in your latest repo. This was the exynos patch i was talking about: f3843e0 cpufreq: exynos: simplify .init() for setting policy->cpus I don't know if you dropped this one or what ? 7ea6658 cpufreq: kirkwood: Add a cpufreq driver for Marvell Kirkwood SoCs