From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Move per-cluster initialization code to ->init() Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 20:47:14 +0530 Message-ID: References: <53BD576F.2010408@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.219.46]:51506 "EHLO mail-oa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756345AbaGIPRP (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2014 11:17:15 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m1so2336782oag.19 for ; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 08:17:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53BD576F.2010408@ti.com> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Santosh Shilimkar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Shawn Guo , Nishanth Menon , Lists linaro-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Tomasz Figa , Stephen Boyd , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas P Abraham , Arvind Chauhan , Sachin Kamat , Lorenzo Pieralisi On 9 July 2014 20:23, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > I scanned this patch and subsequent patches from the series. Since you are > modifying the interfaces and bindings, I just think its better if we can > address the cases where separate clock lines will be used by CPUs. > > Surely don't want to increase your work neither want hold the progress > of the series but if you look at the changes to the interfaces, they > give you a feeling of incompleteness. Lets talk in the other thread you raised, 2/14 .. >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar >> --- > Would you able to give some idea about what will it take to address that one > remainder case as well as part of this series. Which one? This: > We still *don't* support platforms with separate clock/voltage lines for CPUs. > This would be done in a separate patch. Its already fixed as part of this series.