From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751608Ab3FGFSY (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2013 01:18:24 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.219.53]:51896 "EHLO mail-oa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751306Ab3FGFSW (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2013 01:18:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <027e8f1d4ac8de6351115f15a408431558510abb.1365079581.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:48:21 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] cpufreq: powerpc: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Robin Randhawa , Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, arvind.chauhan@arm.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, Paul Mackerras , Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 31 May 2013 16:20, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 20 May 2013 10:10, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 13 May 2013 11:34, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> On 22 April 2013 12:19, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>>> On 9 April 2013 14:05, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>>>> On 5 April 2013 12:16, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>>>>> On 4 April 2013 18:24, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>>>>>> This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt >>>>>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras >>>>>>> Cc: Olof Johansson >>>>>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> Compile Tested only. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig | 31 ---------------------- >>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/Makefile | 1 - >>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile | 2 -- >>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.powerpc | 26 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 3 +++ >>>>>>> .../cpufreq.c => drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 0 >>>>>>> .../cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 0 >>>>>>> .../cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 0 >>>>>>> 8 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) >>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/cpufreq.c => drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c (100%) >>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_32.c => drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c (100%) >>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_64.c => drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c (100%) >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Deepthi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you help testing this please? >>>>> >>>>> Ping!! >>>> >>>> Ping!! >>> >>> Hi Benjamin, >>> >>> Hope you are back from your vacations. Can you give it a try now? >> >> Ping!! > > Ping!! Hi Rafael, Its been more than 2 months now that this patch was first posted. And the response from Maintainers isn't so great, irrespective of how many times I pinged them. This is what I think: - It looked functionally correct to Benjamin but he wanted somebody to actually test it. - Arnd gave his Ack (So it looked functionally correct to him too) - We can probably push this into linux-next now and see if somebody complains of any breakage it has done. If not we can get it pushed for 3.11. -- viresh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-x22f.google.com (mail-oa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 432BE2C009D for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:18:27 +1000 (EST) Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m1so894617oag.34 for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:18:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <027e8f1d4ac8de6351115f15a408431558510abb.1365079581.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:48:21 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] cpufreq: powerpc: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Robin Randhawa , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Paul Mackerras , Olof Johansson , Andrew Morton , arvind.chauhan@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 31 May 2013 16:20, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 20 May 2013 10:10, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 13 May 2013 11:34, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> On 22 April 2013 12:19, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>>> On 9 April 2013 14:05, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>>>> On 5 April 2013 12:16, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>>>>> On 4 April 2013 18:24, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>>>>>> This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt >>>>>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras >>>>>>> Cc: Olof Johansson >>>>>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> Compile Tested only. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig | 31 ---------------------- >>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/Makefile | 1 - >>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile | 2 -- >>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.powerpc | 26 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 3 +++ >>>>>>> .../cpufreq.c => drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 0 >>>>>>> .../cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 0 >>>>>>> .../cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 0 >>>>>>> 8 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) >>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/cpufreq.c => drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c (100%) >>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_32.c => drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c (100%) >>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_64.c => drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c (100%) >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Deepthi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you help testing this please? >>>>> >>>>> Ping!! >>>> >>>> Ping!! >>> >>> Hi Benjamin, >>> >>> Hope you are back from your vacations. Can you give it a try now? >> >> Ping!! > > Ping!! Hi Rafael, Its been more than 2 months now that this patch was first posted. And the response from Maintainers isn't so great, irrespective of how many times I pinged them. This is what I think: - It looked functionally correct to Benjamin but he wanted somebody to actually test it. - Arnd gave his Ack (So it looked functionally correct to him too) - We can probably push this into linux-next now and see if somebody complains of any breakage it has done. If not we can get it pushed for 3.11. -- viresh