From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:24:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] cpufreq: sh: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq Message-Id: List-Id: References: <3167220d1e262ff22078993a5beec55e82dfd951.1365079581.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20130409125509.GH15412@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20130409125509.GH15412@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Simon Horman Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, arvind.chauhan@arm.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, Paul Mundt , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On 9 April 2013 18:25, Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq. > > Why? > > I am missing the cover email where I assume the explanation lies. Hi Simon, The idea was to keep all cpufreq drivers at a common and most suitable place, so that future consolidation work can be done easily and efficiently. So, functionally this patch shouldn't change anything. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936242Ab3DIOMz (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:12:55 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.219.49]:48508 "EHLO mail-oa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932875Ab3DIOMw (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:12:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130409125509.GH15412@verge.net.au> References: <3167220d1e262ff22078993a5beec55e82dfd951.1365079581.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20130409125509.GH15412@verge.net.au> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 19:42:51 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] cpufreq: sh: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq From: Viresh Kumar To: Simon Horman Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, arvind.chauhan@arm.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, Paul Mundt , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9 April 2013 18:25, Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq. > > Why? > > I am missing the cover email where I assume the explanation lies. Hi Simon, The idea was to keep all cpufreq drivers at a common and most suitable place, so that future consolidation work can be done easily and efficiently. So, functionally this patch shouldn't change anything.