All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pierre Ossman <pierre-list@ossman.eu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix current freq check on policy update
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:53:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKohponPbf9hiL7YwNwSrjS1nM3AQ2-PMWhf3ERCBtY_6nOejg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5301C379.9020909@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 17 February 2014 13:38, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hmm, that would be good. However, I did find something odd while browsing
> through the powernow-k8 code.
>
> It maintains a per-cpu data-structure called powernow_data, but it is
> initialized only for the policy->cpu.

I thought about it earlier, but thought it will be called only with policy->cpu
by core.

> In powernowk8_cpu_init():
>
>         per_cpu(powernow_data, pol->cpu) = data;
>
> Everywhere in the code, this per-cpu data-structure is accessed always with
> pol->cpu as the argument, *except* in powernowk8_get():
>
> 1210 static unsigned int powernowk8_get(unsigned int cpu)
> 1211 {
> 1212         struct powernow_k8_data *data = per_cpu(powernow_data, cpu);
> 1213         unsigned int khz = 0;
> 1214         int err;
> 1215
> 1216         if (!data)
> 1217                 return 0;
> 1218
> 1219         smp_call_function_single(cpu, query_values_on_cpu, &err, true);
> 1220         if (err)
> 1221                 goto out;
> 1222
> 1223         khz = find_khz_freq_from_fid(data->currfid);
> 1224
>
> So, obviously it finds data to be uninitialized if cpu != pol->cpu, and hence
> it would return 0 due to the "if (!data)" check. In other words, the init
> routine initializes the per-cpu memory only for the pol->cpu, whereas the
> ->get() routine tries to access it for some other cpu, and fails.

bingo!!

> So I think the following patch should fix your problem. Basically, this
> initializes the per-cpu data-structures of all the CPUs to the correct memory,
> and not just for the pol->cpu.
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> index e10b646..bd7bc39 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> @@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ static int powernowk8_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *pol)
>  {
>         struct powernow_k8_data *data;
>         struct init_on_cpu init_on_cpu;
> -       int rc;
> +       int rc, cpu;
>
>         smp_call_function_single(pol->cpu, check_supported_cpu, &rc, 1);
>         if (rc)
> @@ -1140,7 +1140,9 @@ static int powernowk8_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *pol)
>         pr_debug("cpu_init done, current fid 0x%x, vid 0x%x\n",
>                  data->currfid, data->currvid);
>
> -       per_cpu(powernow_data, pol->cpu) = data;
> +       /* Point all the CPUs in this policy to the same data */
> +       for_each_cpu(cpu, pol->cpus)
> +               per_cpu(powernow_data, cpu) = data;

You need to do something similar on: powernowk8_cpu_exit() as well
which sets it to zero.

Please send a patch for it, that is the problem for sure.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-17  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-14  6:26 [PATCH] cpufreq: fix current freq check on policy update Pierre Ossman
2014-02-14 11:44 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-02-14 13:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-14 14:34   ` Pierre Ossman
2014-02-17  5:06     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-02-17  8:08     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-02-17  8:23       ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2014-02-17  8:21         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKohponPbf9hiL7YwNwSrjS1nM3AQ2-PMWhf3ERCBtY_6nOejg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre-list@ossman.eu \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.