From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750908AbaDOEBQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:01:16 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:37243 "EHLO mail-ob0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761AbaDOEBP (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:01:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140414232801.GF1877@localhost.localdomain> References: <20140414232801.GF1877@localhost.localdomain> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:31:14 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/38] tick-sched: move nohz_full_buf[] inside tick_nohz_init() From: Viresh Kumar To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Lists linaro-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arvind Chauhan , Linaro Networking Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 15 April 2014 04:58, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > OTOH nohz_full_buf can have a big size and moving it to a local variable > will result in big increase in kernel stack consumption. > > Keeping it static is safer. > > Also it's already __initdata so it's released after bootup. No issue of > concurrent use either, so keeping it as is is fine. Okay, this patch is dropped.